These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10227124)

  • 21. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections: use of lymphocyte transformation test.
    Chukwu CC
    Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Jun; 12(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 3935592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The porcine brucellosis--evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in occurrence of false positive serological reactions.
    Weiner M; Szulowski K; Iwaniak W
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2013; 16(1):129-30. PubMed ID: 23691587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing.
    Godfroid J; Saegerman C; Wellemans V; Walravens K; Letesson JJ; Tibor A; Mc Millan A; Spencer S; Sanna M; Bakker D; Pouillot R; Garin-Bastuji B
    Vet Microbiol; 2002 Dec; 90(1-4):461-77. PubMed ID: 12414165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis using B. melitensis strain B115.
    Corrente M; Desario C; Parisi A; Grandolfo E; Scaltrito D; Vesco G; Colao V; Buonavoglia D
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Dec; 119():106-9. PubMed ID: 26476137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and validation of a competitive ELISA kit for the serological diagnosis of ovine, caprine and bovine brucellosis.
    Portanti O; Tittarelli M; Di Febo T; Luciani M; Mercante MT; Conte A; Lelli R
    J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2006 Dec; 53(10):494-8. PubMed ID: 17123429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The background of the serological cross-reaction between Yersinia and Brucella and the possibility of differential diagnostics by the ELISA technique and the electroimmuno assay (rocket electrophoresis) (author's transl)].
    Hurvell B
    Nord Vet Med; 1978; 30(7-8):305-17. PubMed ID: 693273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative analysis of Brucella serotype A and M and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 polysaccharides for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle, sheep, and goats.
    Díaz-Aparicio E; Aragón V; Marín C; Alonso B; Font M; Moreno E; Pérez-Ortiz S; Blasco JM; Díaz R; Moriyón I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3136-41. PubMed ID: 8308104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of three serological tests in the diagnosis of Brucella infection in unvaccinated cattle in Eritrea.
    Omer MK; Skjerve E; MacMillan AP; Woldehiwet Z
    Prev Vet Med; 2001 Feb; 48(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 11182464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.
    Jungersen G; Sørensen V; Giese SB; Stack JA; Riber U
    Epidemiol Infect; 2006 Apr; 134(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 16490140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differentiation of serological responses to Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O9 and Brucella species by immunoblot or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using whole bacteria and Yersinia outer membrane proteins.
    Schoerner C; Wartenberg K; Röllinghoff M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1570-4. PubMed ID: 2380382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of a western blotting assay to discriminate Brucella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 infections in sheep.
    Corrente M; Desario C; Greco G; Buonavoglia D; Pratelli A; Madio A; Scaltrito D; Consenti B; Buonavoglia C
    New Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15164626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An evaluation of the capability of existing and novel serodiagnostic methods for porcine brucellosis to reduce false positive serological reactions.
    McGiven JA; Nicola A; Commander NJ; Duncombe L; Taylor AV; Villari S; Dainty A; Thirlwall R; Bouzelmat N; Perrett LL; Brew SD; Stack JA
    Vet Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 160(3-4):378-86. PubMed ID: 22763172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Immunoblot studies in the differential diagnosis of porcine brucellosis: an immunodominant 62 kDa protein is related to the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat shock protein (HSP-65).
    Spencer SA; Broughton ES; Hamid S; Young DB
    Vet Microbiol; 1994 Mar; 39(1-2):47-60. PubMed ID: 8203127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differentiation of the serologicl response to Yersinia enterocolitica and Brucella abortus in cattle.
    Corbel MJ; Cullen GA
    J Hyg (Lond); 1970 Dec; 68(4):519-30. PubMed ID: 4992575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The microplate agglutination test: a simple technique to assist in the differentiation of bovine brucellosis and yersiniosis.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Vet Rec; 1980 May 3-17; 106(18-20):403-5. PubMed ID: 7434502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis.
    Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Penrose M; de Lisle GW; Letesson JJ; Garin-Bastuji B; Searson J; Fossati CA; Cloeckaert A
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):257-70. PubMed ID: 8748541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The antigenic relationship between Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:3 and 0:9].
    Kocabeyoğlu O
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 1990 Jul; 24(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 1704479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of three serum i-ELISAs using monoclonal antibodies and protein G as peroxidase conjugate for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.
    Saegerman C; De Waele L; Gilson D; Godfroid J; Thiange P; Michel P; Limbourg B; Vo TK; Limet J; Letesson JJ; Berkvens D
    Vet Microbiol; 2004 May; 100(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 15135517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The serological relationship between Escherichia coli O157 and Yersinia enterocolitica O9 using sera from patients with brucellosis.
    Chart H; Okubadejo OA; Rowe B
    Epidemiol Infect; 1992 Feb; 108(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 1547843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibody against Brucella abortus in cattle sera using an automated ELISA workstation.
    Paweska JT; Potts AD; Harris HJ; Smith SJ; Viljoen GJ; Dungu B; Brett OL; Bubb M; Prozesky L
    Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 2002 Mar; 69(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 12092779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.