These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10227124)

  • 41. Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.
    Thirlwall RE; Commander NJ; Brew SD; Cutler SJ; McGiven JA; Stack JA
    Vet Res Commun; 2008 Mar; 32(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 17934790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Human and animal epidemic of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9, 1989-1997, Auvergne, France.
    Gourdon F; Beytout J; Reynaud A; Romaszko JP; Perre D; Theodore P; Soubelet H; Sirot J
    Emerg Infect Dis; 1999; 5(5):719-21. PubMed ID: 10511531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis.
    Dieste-Pérez L; Blasco JM; De Miguel MJ; Marín CM; Barberán M; Conde-Álvarez R; Moriyón I; Muñoz PM
    Vet Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 168(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24331743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new homogeneous assay for high throughput serological diagnosis of brucellosis in ruminants.
    McGiven JA; Sawyer J; Perrett LL; Brew SD; Commander NJ; Fisher A; McLarnon S; Harper K; Stack JA
    J Immunol Methods; 2008 Aug; 337(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 18579152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development of an LPS-based ELISA for diagnosis of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 infections in Danish patients: a follow-up study.
    Dalby T; Rasmussen E; Schiellerup P; Krogfelt KA
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 May; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28545413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A simple technique to differentiate between animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica IX and those infected with Brucella abortus.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Res Vet Sci; 1979 Mar; 26(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 122268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Use of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for screening cattle for Brucella antibodies in Nigeria.
    Ocholi RA; Ezeokoli CD; Akerejola OO; Saror DI
    Vet Q; 1996 Mar; 18(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 8833608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Studies on the relationship between Yersinia enterocolitica IX and Brucella abortus agglutinins in naturally infected animals.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Res Vet Sci; 1980 May; 28(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 6774395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Diagnostic performance of serological tests for swine brucellosis in the presence of false positive serological reactions.
    Dieste-Pérez L; Blasco JM; de Miguel MJ; Moriyón I; Muñoz PM
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Apr; 111():57-63. PubMed ID: 25661496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The ELISA for the examination of hare sera for anti-Brucella antibodies.
    Szulowski K; Iwaniak W; Pilaszek J; Truszczyński M; Chrobocińska M
    Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Jan; 22(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 10099027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Time course of the serological response to Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in experimentally infected pigs.
    Nielsen B; Heisel C; Wingstrand A
    Vet Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 48(3-4):293-303. PubMed ID: 9054125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Serologic response of pigs to experimental infection with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O9 and Brucella abortus.
    Mittal KR; Tizard IR
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Mar; 42(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 6791534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Seroprevalence of Brucella suis in eastern Latvian wild boars (Sus scrofa).
    Grantina-Ievina L; Avsejenko J; Cvetkova S; Krastina D; Streikisa M; Steingolde Z; Vevere I; Rodze I
    Acta Vet Scand; 2018 Mar; 60(1):19. PubMed ID: 29573743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Observations on serological cross-reactions between smooth Brucella species and organisms of other genera.
    Corbel MJ; Stuart FA; Brewer RA
    Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():341-8. PubMed ID: 6489620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Value of different serological tests in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the Amazonian region.
    Molnár E; Molnár L; Vale WG
    Acta Vet Hung; 1998; 46(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 9704523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Brucellosis: serological methods compared.
    Heizmann W; Botzenhart K; Döller G; Schanz D; Hermann G; Fleischmann K
    J Hyg (Lond); 1985 Dec; 95(3):639-53. PubMed ID: 4093607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The serological relationship between Brucella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica serotype IX and Salmonella serotypes of Kauffmann-White group N.
    Corbell MJ
    J Hyg (Lond); 1975 Aug; 75(1):151-71. PubMed ID: 807618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A rapid method for detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 in pig feces using monoclonal antibodies.
    Li Q; DiSanto ME; Magee WE
    Vet Microbiol; 1992 Jul; 32(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 1381126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Some serological reactions to "brucella" antigen in the horse.
    Dawson FL; Durrant DS
    Equine Vet J; 1975 Jul; 7(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 1157808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [A preliminary study on serological differentiation between antibody against Brucella and that against Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O: 9].
    Lu Q
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1993 Oct; 14(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 8137410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.