These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10227529)

  • 1. Metallic marking clips used after stereotactic breast biopsy: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1417-9. PubMed ID: 10227529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Titanium vs carbon coated ceramic breast tissue marker clips: 3T MR susceptibility artifact and local signal disturbance.
    Ghate SV; Baker JA; Hawkins AD; Soher BJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):770-3. PubMed ID: 21419666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and MRI artifact evaluation at 1.5 T of metallic mounting sheath of a marking clip inadvertently deployed at stereotactic biopsy.
    Lanners DM; Amrami KK; Jonsgaard RS; Gisvold JJ; Felmlee JP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):825-9. PubMed ID: 15333376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging and vascular access ports: ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Nogueira M; Morisoli S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 7549216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.
    Shellock FG; Crues JV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 3260731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR imaging-guided breast biopsy using a coaxial technique with a 14-gauge stainless steel core biopsy needle and a titanium sheath.
    Lehman CD; Eby PR; Chen X; Dee KE; Thursten B; McCloskey J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):183-5. PubMed ID: 12818854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biopsy needles and devices: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifacts during exposure to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Moscatel MA; Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(3):369-72. PubMed ID: 7633117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants.
    Davis PL; Crooks L; Arakawa M; McRee R; Kaufman L; Margulis AR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Oct; 137(4):857-60. PubMed ID: 6974985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification.
    Kumar R; Lerski RA; Gandy S; Clift BA; Abboud RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1799-802. PubMed ID: 16838376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11536406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips.
    Genson CC; Blane CE; Helvie MA; Waits SA; Chenevert TL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17242244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of a collagen-plug biopsy site marking device deployed after stereotactic core needle breast biopsy.
    Rosen EL; Baker JA; Soo MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1295-9. PubMed ID: 14573422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report.
    Devge C; Tjellström A; Nellström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 9197100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
    New PF; Rosen BR; Brady TJ; Buonanno FS; Kistler JP; Burt CT; Hinshaw WS; Newhouse JH; Pohost GM; Taveras JM
    Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 6828719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and artifacts of cardiac occluders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 8180463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts of breast tissue expanders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Fagan LL; Shellock FG; Brenner RJ; Rothman B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(5):614-6. PubMed ID: 8574049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR-guided stereotactic breast biopsy: technical aspects and preliminary results.
    Panizza P; De Cobelli F; De Gaspari A; Gusmini S; Zanello A; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):232-44. PubMed ID: 14612844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts produced by heart valve prostheses exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(5):756-8. PubMed ID: 7981523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
    Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.