These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10227558)

  • 1. Comparison of soft tissue profile changes in serial extraction and late premolar extraction.
    Wilson JR; Little RM; Joondeph DR; Doppel DM
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):165-73; discussion 173-4. PubMed ID: 10227558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of extraction treatment on Holdaway soft-tissue measurements.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15132442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Zierhut EC; Joondeph DR; Artun J; Little RM
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 10926430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Khan M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jul; 20(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 20642945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson G; Carvalho PE; Cançado RH; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17628247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extractions in adult females.
    Kachiwala VA; Kalha AS; Machado G
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19634460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.
    Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 18538251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips.
    Wholley CJ; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 12940559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of computerized video imaging in predicting adult extraction treatment outcomes.
    Le TN; Sameshima GT; Grubb JE; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 9770096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandibular second premolar extraction--postretention evaluation of stability and relapse.
    McReynolds DC; Little RM
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 2064071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.