227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10227889)
21. Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: findings in 311 lesions.
Quillin SP; Atilla S; Brown JJ; Borrello JA; Yu CY; Pilgram TK
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 9201674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hepatic metastases of soft tissue angiosarcoma: CT and MR imaging findings.
Tateishi U; Hasegawa T; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
Abdom Imaging; 2003; 28(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 14628871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hepatic metastases: randomized, controlled comparison of detection with MR imaging and CT.
Stark DD; Wittenberg J; Butch RJ; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 3310094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Focal nodular hyperplasia: findings at state-of-the-art MR imaging, US, CT, and pathologic analysis.
Hussain SM; Terkivatan T; Zondervan PE; Lanjouw E; de Rave S; Ijzermans JN; de Man RA
Radiographics; 2004; 24(1):3-17; discussion 18-9. PubMed ID: 14730031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Imaging of focal liver lesions: the 90 %-rule.
Mostbeck G
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):545-7. PubMed ID: 21117006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Liver neoplasms: diagnostic pitfalls in cross-sectional imaging.
Ito K; Honjo K; Fujita T; Awaya H; Matsumoto T; Matsunaga N; Higuchi M; Kada T; Mattrey RF
Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):273-93. PubMed ID: 8966286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A hypervascular pseudotumor in the liver with angiodysplasia in the center of the lesion: a new entity or a variant of focal nodular hyperplasia?
Morise Z; Urano M; Sugioka A; Mizoguchi Y; Kato R; Hoshimoto S; Kato T; Ikeda M; Kuroda M
Int J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jul; 15(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 17652535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Solitary necrotic nodules of the liver mimicking hepatic metastasis: report of two cases.
Yoon KH; Yun KJ; Lee JM; Kim CG
Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 11752949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: CT and sonographic spectrum.
Shirkhoda A; Farah MC; Bernacki E; Madrazo B; Roberts J
Abdom Imaging; 1994; 19(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 8161900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Distinguishing clinical and imaging features of nodular regenerative hyperplasia and large regenerative nodules of the liver.
Ames JT; Federle MP; Chopra K
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1190-5. PubMed ID: 19913129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Imaging of nontraumatic hemorrhagic hepatic lesions.
Casillas VJ; Amendola MA; Gascue A; Pinnar N; Levi JU; Perez JM
Radiographics; 2000; 20(2):367-78. PubMed ID: 10715337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Lee YH; Kim SH; Cho MY; Shim KY; Kim MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):W459-63. PubMed ID: 17449744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterization of hepatocellular tumors: value of mangafodipir-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Scharitzer M; Schima W; Schober E; Reimer P; Helmberger TK; Holzknecht N; Stadler A; Ba-Ssalamah A; Weber M; Wrba F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 15772534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The magnetic resonance of small hepatocarcinoma. A comparison with echography, computed tomography, digital angiography and computed tomography with lipiodol].
De Santis M; Cristani A; Cioni G; Casolo A; Canossi G; Ventura E; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 1335589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dysplastic nodules of the liver: imaging findings.
Choi BI; Han JK; Hong SH; Kim TK; Song CS; Kim KW; Kim MJ; Han MC
Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 10227888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MR diagnosis of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors versus hemangiomas: relative merits of dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced gradient-recalled echo and unenhanced spin-echo images.
Soyer P; Gueye C; Somveille E; Laissy JP; Scherrer A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1407-13. PubMed ID: 7484575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Infarcted regenerative nodules in cirrhosis: CT and MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation.
Kim T; Baron RL; Nalesnik MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 11000176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differential diagnosis of hepatocellular nodular lesions.
Hytiroglou P; Theise ND
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1998 Nov; 15(4):285-99. PubMed ID: 9845429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Eosinophilic hepatic necrosis: magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography comparison.
Yu JS; Yoon SW; Park MS; Lee JH; Kim KW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):765-71. PubMed ID: 16272849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MR characterization of focal liver lesions: pearls and pitfalls.
Siegelman ES; Chauhan A
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2014 Aug; 22(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 25086931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
