These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
878 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1022805)
1. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions. Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings. Ambrose L Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond. Martin PA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade. Mcfarlane DR Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills? Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health. Harrison LK; Naylor KL Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health care policy and abortion: a comparison. Cohen SS Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 2403668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court to decide if minors may consent to abortion, declares Roe and Doe don't protect nonphysicians, upholds jobless pay during pregnancy. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):105-6. PubMed ID: 12258973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A world without Roe: how different would it be? Glendon MA Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]