These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
878 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1022805)
21. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape. Baron CH Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Supreme Court's abortion rulings and social change. Brady DW; Kemp K Soc Sci Q; 1976 Dec; 57(3):535-46. PubMed ID: 11663700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid. Mendelson JE; Domolky S Soc Serv Rev; 1980 Mar; 54(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 10297796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade. Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. "Sound law and undoubtedly good policy": Roe v. Wade in comparative perspective. Mylchreest I J Policy Hist; 1995; 7(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 12346345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The legal issues surrounding the continued refusal of hospitals to allow abortions. Wasserman R Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 12307552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Policy implementation and responsiveness in nongovernmental institutions: hospital abortion services after Roe v. Wade. Johnson CA; Bond JR West Polit Q; 1982 Sep; 35(3):385-405. PubMed ID: 11655638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The road to moderation: the significance of Webster for legislation restricting abortion. Wardle LD Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 2628653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. June, bioethics and the Supreme Court. Gardell MA J Med Philos; 1986 Aug; 11(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 3794559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Editorial: The right to choose abortion. Roemer R Am J Public Health; 1974 Aug; 64(8):751 passim. PubMed ID: 4835139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. County Exec. of Prince George's County v. Doe. Maryland. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1984 Aug; 479():352-63. PubMed ID: 11648348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions. Satris MJ Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy. Kim JH; Gunderson A; Lane EA; Bauer NM J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):569-592. PubMed ID: 36693180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals. Benshoof J Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The medical assumption at the Foundation of Roe v. Wade & its implications for women's health. Forsythe C Issues Law Med; 2014; 29(2):183-230. PubMed ID: 25936207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]