These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10228538)

  • 1. Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program.
    Tonita JM; Hillis JP; Lim CH
    Radiology; 1999 May; 211(2):529-33. PubMed ID: 10228538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.
    Henderson LM; Benefield T; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Durham DD; Yankaskas BC; Bowling JM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 25435185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?
    Henderson LM; Benefield T; Bowling JM; Durham DD; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Yankaskas BC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 25794085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporation of the technologist's opinion for arbitration of discrepant assessments among radiologists at screening mammography.
    Coolen AMP; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Louwman MWJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 171(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 29730729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organized breast screening programs in Canada: effect of radiologist reading volumes on outcomes.
    Coldman AJ; Major D; Doyle GP; D'yachkova Y; Phillips N; Onysko J; Shumak R; Smith NE; Wadden N
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):809-15. PubMed ID: 16424236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.
    Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Cohen CS; Clearfield RJ; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 15766687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single reading with computer-aided detection performed by selected radiologists in a breast cancer screening program.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Del Amo M; Arguis P; Ríos J; Grau J; Burrel M; Cores E; Velasco M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 83(11):2019-23. PubMed ID: 25193778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.
    Kan L; Olivotto IA; Warren Burhenne LJ; Sickles EA; Coldman AJ
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):563-7. PubMed ID: 10796940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
    Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added Value of Prereading Screening Mammograms for Breast Cancer by Radiologic Technologists on Early Screening Outcomes.
    Geertse TD; Setz-Pels W; van der Waal D; Nederend J; Korte B; Tetteroo E; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJM; Duijm LEM
    Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):276-283. PubMed ID: 34751612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.
    Elmore JG; Wells CK; Lee CH; Howard DH; Feinstein AR
    N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1493-9. PubMed ID: 7969300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Performance of Mammographic Breast Positioning in an Academic Radiology Practice.
    Pal S; Ikeda DM; Jesinger RA; Mickelsen LJ; Chen CA; Larson DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Apr; 210(4):807-815. PubMed ID: 29412019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment.
    Tan A; Freeman DH; Goodwin JS; Freeman JL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 100(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 16819566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.
    Rawashdeh MA; Lee WB; Bourne RM; Ryan EA; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard RC; Black DA; Brennan PC
    Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 23737538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening program.
    Hofvind S; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):652-60. PubMed ID: 19789229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.
    Elmore JG; Miglioretti DL; Reisch LM; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Christiansen CL; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Sep; 94(18):1373-80. PubMed ID: 12237283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of Radiology Trainees on Screening Mammography Interpretation.
    Hawley JR; Taylor CR; Cubbison AM; Erdal BS; Yildiz VO; Carkaci S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 26924162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.