215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10229476)
1. Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients.
Lyon RD; Griggs KA; Johnson AM; Olsen JR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Apr; 10(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 10229476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence and management of catheter occlusion in implantable arm ports: results in 391 patients.
Whigham CJ; Greenbaum MC; Fisher RG; Goodman CJ; Thornby JI; Thomas JW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jun; 10(6):767-74. PubMed ID: 10392945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infectious complications of 393 peripherally implantable venous access devices in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.
Whigham CJ; Goodman CJ; Fisher RG; Greenbaum MC; Thornby JI; Thomas JW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jan; 10(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10872493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists.
Hills JR; Cardella JF; Cardella K; Waybill PN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 9399467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients.
Funaki B; Zaleski GX
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):1281. PubMed ID: 10527209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.
Kawamura J; Nagayama S; Nomura A; Itami A; Okabe H; Sato S; Watanabe G; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 13(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 18704637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arm placement of the Cook titanium Petite Vital-Port: results of radiologic placement in 125 patients with cancer.
Burbridge B; Krieger E; Stoneham G
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2000 Jun; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 10914081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients].
Lenhart M; Schätzler S; Manke C; Strotzer M; Seitz J; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Herold T; Paetzel C
Rofo; 2010 Jan; 182(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19536729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.
Taxbro K; Hammarskjöld F; Thelin B; Lewin F; Hagman H; Hanberger H; Berg S
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 122(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 31005243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.
Biffi R; de Braud F; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Mauri S; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F; Andreoni B
Ann Oncol; 1998 Jul; 9(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 9739444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison Between Upper Arm and Chest for Optimal Site of Totally Implanted Venous Access Ports in Patients with Female Breast Cancer.
Yang SS; Ahn MS
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 50():128-134. PubMed ID: 29481918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiologic placement of long-term central venous peripheral access system ports (PAS Port): results in 150 patients.
Foley MJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 7787360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Bertoglio S; Cafiero F; Meszaros P; Varaldo E; Blondeaux E; Molinelli C; Minuto M
J Vasc Access; 2020 Jul; 21(4):460-466. PubMed ID: 31674857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interventional radiology placement of twin Tesio catheters for dialysis access: review of 75 patients.
Caridi JG; Grundy LS; Ross EA; Prabhu PN; Tonkin JC; Hawkins IF; Wiechmann BN; Pevarski DJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 10872494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
