These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10229515)

  • 1. A comparison of response time and word recognition measures using a word-monitoring and closed-set identification task.
    Mackersie C; Neuman AC; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 10229515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response time and word recognition using a Modified-Rhyme monitoring task: list equivalency and time-order effects.
    Mackersie C; Neuman AC; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 10613389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between vocal reaction time and word recognition measures of children with APD and age-matched peers using auditory word discrimination test.
    Putter-Katz H; Peled M; Schaik M; Sachartov E; Feldman I; Adi-Ben Said L; Miran D; Kushnir D
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2002; 13(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 16411424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-assessment of communication skills: toward the development of a new speech audiometric tool.
    Yanz JL; Carlstrom JE; Thibodeau LM
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 4043576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; Ellis EM; Baltzell LS; McMillan GP
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26989823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance on a Spanish picture-identification task using a multimedia format.
    McCullough JA; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):254-60. PubMed ID: 11392437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance-intensity functions of Mandarin word recognition tests in noise: test dialect and listener language effects.
    Liu D; Shi LF
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23800810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Leensen MCJ; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.
    Alexander JM; Masterson K
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e35-49. PubMed ID: 25470368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.