These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10229978)

  • 1. Measurement of olfactory threshold using an evoked potential technique.
    Wada M
    Rhinology; 1999 Mar; 37(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 10229978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intranasal chemoreception in patients with multiple chemical sensitivities: a double-blind investigation.
    Hummel T; Roscher S; Jaumann MP; Kobal G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 24(1 Pt 2):S79-86. PubMed ID: 8921561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.
    Stuck BA; Frey S; Freiburg C; Hörmann K; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Bertrand B; Guerit JM; Hummel T
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2006; 36(2):53-62. PubMed ID: 16844543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Electrophysiological study of olfactory sensitivity in the carp].
    Il'in IuN; Belousova TA; Fesenko EE; Flerova GI
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1983 Mar; 69(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 6406277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Nordin S
    Chem Senses; 2004 Sep; 29(7):629-37. PubMed ID: 15337687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Boesveldt S; Haehner A; Berendse HW; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):690-5. PubMed ID: 17188566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Olfactory testing in clinical practice.
    Rombaux P; Collet S; Martinage S; Eloy P; Bertrand B; Negoias S; Hummel T
    B-ENT; 2009; 5 Suppl 13():39-51. PubMed ID: 20084804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Basics, methods and indications for objective olfactometry].
    Welge-Lüssen A; Wolfensberger M; Kobal G; Hummel T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Sep; 81(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 12357417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Olfactory and chemosomatosensory function in pregnant women assessed with event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Broman DA; Wulff M; Martinkauppi M; Nordin S
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep; 86(1-2):252-7. PubMed ID: 16112693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Introduction to clinical investigation of olfactory evoked potentials].
    Obrebowski A; Swidziński T; Swidziński P
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 15307468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Functional status of the olfactory analyzer in a sealed cabin environment].
    Pashin SS; Solomin GI
    Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1985; 19(4):90-2. PubMed ID: 2865394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of the olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin' sticks.
    Albrecht J; Anzinger A; Kopietz R; Schöpf V; Kleemann AM; Pollatos O; Wiesmann M
    Chem Senses; 2008 Jun; 33(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 18390818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The combined olfactory test in a Chinese population.
    Lam HC; Sung JK; Abdullah VJ; van Hasselt CA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Feb; 120(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 16359576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chemosensory event-related potentials during sleep--a pilot study.
    Stuck BA; Weitz H; Hörmann K; Maurer JT; Hummel T
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 16934401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discordance between olfactory psychophysical measurements and olfactory event related potentials in five patients with olfactory dysfunction following upper respiratory infection.
    Guan J; Ni DF; Wang J; Gao ZQ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Jul; 122(13):1554-7. PubMed ID: 19719947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjects with congenital anosmia have larger peripheral but similar central trigeminal responses.
    Frasnelli J; Schuster B; Hummel T
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Feb; 17(2):370-7. PubMed ID: 16525127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Do blind persons have a better sense of smell than normal sighted people?].
    Schwenn O; Hundorf I; Moll B; Pitz S; Mann WJ
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):649-54. PubMed ID: 12410464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Olfactory evoked potentials produced by electrical stimulation of the olfactory mucosa].
    Xu C; Ni D; Li F
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 34(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 12764777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which variables matter in smell tests in the clinic?
    Philpott CM; Wolstenholme CR; Goodenough PC; Clark A; Murty GE
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Oct; 121(10):952-6. PubMed ID: 17359553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.