These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10230131)

  • 21. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
    Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unified Expression of the Quasi-Static Electromagnetic Field: Demonstration With MEG and EEG Signals.
    Taulu S; Larson E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Mar; 68(3):992-1004. PubMed ID: 32746058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
    Gençer NG; Acar CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Magnetoencephalography signals are influenced by skull defects.
    Lau S; Flemming L; Haueisen J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 125(8):1653-62. PubMed ID: 24418220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Localization of coherent sources by simultaneous MEG and EEG beamformer.
    Hong JH; Ahn M; Kim K; Jun SC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1121-35. PubMed ID: 23793511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DYNAMO: concurrent dynamic multi-model source localization method for EEG and/or MEG.
    Antelis JM; Minguez J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Jan; 212(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 23022309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Gavit L; Baillet S; Mangin JF; Pescatore J; Garnero L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 11585031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations.
    Ebersole JS; Ebersole SM
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 27(6):360-71. PubMed ID: 21076318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
    Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization.
    Yoshinaga H; Nakahori T; Ohtsuka Y; Oka E; Kitamura Y; Kiriyama H; Kinugasa K; Miyamoto K; Hoshida T
    Epilepsia; 2002 Aug; 43(8):924-8. PubMed ID: 12181013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cuffin BN; Cohen D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Aug; 47(2):132-46. PubMed ID: 95707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
    Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.