148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10231041)
1. Anonymous oocyte donation performed exclusively with embryos cryopreserved at the pronuclear stage.
Damario MA; Hammitt DG; Galanits TM; Stevens SA; Session DR; Dumesic DA
Fertil Steril; 1999 May; 71(5):830-5. PubMed ID: 10231041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shared oocyte donation: society's benefits.
Moomjy M; Mangieri R; Beltramone F; Cholst I; Veeck L; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2000 Jun; 73(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 10856476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze.
Damario MA; Hammitt DG; Galanits TM; Session DR; Dumesic DA
Fertil Steril; 1999 Dec; 72(6):1049-54. PubMed ID: 10593380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.
Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Keegan D; Grifo JA; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):574-8. PubMed ID: 19815192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of starting ovarian stimulation on day 2 versus day 15 of the menstrual cycle in the same oocyte donor and pregnancy rates among the corresponding recipients of vitrified oocytes.
Martínez F; Clua E; Devesa M; Rodríguez I; Arroyo G; González C; Solé M; Tur R; Coroleu B; Barri PN
Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1307-11. PubMed ID: 25154677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Report of four donor-recipient oocyte cryopreservation cycles resulting in high pregnancy and implantation rates.
Barritt J; Luna M; Duke M; Grunfeld L; Mukherjee T; Sandler B; Copperman AB
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):189.e13-7. PubMed ID: 17094985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
Cobo A; de los Santos MJ; Castellò D; Gámiz P; Campos P; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A protocol for satisfying the ethical issues raised by oocyte donation: the free, anonymous, and fertile donors.
Frydman R; Letur-Könirsch H; de Ziegler D; Bydlowski M; Raoul-Duval A; Selva J
Fertil Steril; 1990 Apr; 53(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 2318325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of the efficiency of an oocyte donation program using egg cryo-banking.
Nagy ZP; Chang CC; Shapiro DB; Bernal DP; Elsner CW; Mitchell-Leef D; Toledo AA; Kort HI
Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 18692830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes: an update.
Gelety T; Surrey E
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 5(5):606-14. PubMed ID: 8241436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles.
Kontopoulos G; Simopoulou M; Zervomanolakis I; Prokopakis T; Dimitropoulos K; Dedoulis E; Grigorakis S; Agapitou K; Nikitos E; Rapani A; Vlahos N
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jun; 55(6):. PubMed ID: 31226849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryo donation: a programmed approach.
Lindheim SR; Sauer MV
Fertil Steril; 1999 Nov; 72(5):940-1. PubMed ID: 10561004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation.
Söderström-Anttila V; Vilska S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Oct; 15(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 17908406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate.
Cobo A; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1426-34.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26353081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
