203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10231082)
1. Goodness-of-fit issues in ROC curve estimation.
Walsh SJ
Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 10231082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
Mossman D
Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing an underlying assumption on a ROC curve based on rating data.
Zhou XH
Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 7564941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power.
Walsh SJ
Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9131755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Davidov O; Nov Y
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.
Ma G; Hall WJ
Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
Pan X; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.
Tosteson AN; Begg CB
Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 3294553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
