These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10231082)

  • 1. Goodness-of-fit issues in ROC curve estimation.
    Walsh SJ
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 10231082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
    Mossman D
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing an underlying assumption on a ROC curve based on rating data.
    Zhou XH
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 7564941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power.
    Walsh SJ
    Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9131755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
    Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
    Davidov O; Nov Y
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
    Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ma G; Hall WJ
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
    Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
    Pan X; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hanley JA
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.
    Tosteson AN; Begg CB
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 3294553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
    Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
    Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
    Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.