These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10232004)
1. Report of Anne C. Speckhard, Ph.D. Speckhard AC Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 10232004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Karlin v. Foust United States District Court western District of Wisconsin June 19, 1997. Bostrom B Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):377-88. PubMed ID: 10231999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Report of Sandra Mahkorn, M.D., M.P.H., M.S. Mahkorn S Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 10232002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Report of Peter R. Uhlenberg, Ph D. Uhlenberg PR Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):391-423. PubMed ID: 10232000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Report of John G. Gianopoulos. Gianopoulos JG Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 10232001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Report of Basil Jackson, M.D., Ph.D., Th.D., J.D., D.Litt. Jackson B Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 10232003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Karlin v. Foust. U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 975():1177-235. PubMed ID: 11648430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Karlin v. Foust. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 1999 Aug; 188():446-500. PubMed ID: 11890144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rust v Sullivan: legal issues and ethical concerns. Spielman B Womens Health Issues; 1991; 1(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 1822812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion without free and informed consent? An Austrian case of first impression. Bernat E J Med Philos; 2001 Jun; 26(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 11445885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents. Ehrlich JS Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade. Trends in the mortality and morbidity of women. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA; 1992 Dec; 268(22):3231-9. PubMed ID: 1433765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Report regarding: Karlin et al. v. Foust et al., August 12, 1996. Jackson B IRB; 1999; 14(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 11657968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A 26-year-old woman seeking an abortion. Grimes DA JAMA; 1999 Sep 22-29; 282(12):1169-75. PubMed ID: 10501121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Minor's abortion: is the requirement for parental consent ethically justified? Yussman SM Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 8819670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]