These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10232818)

  • 1. Bootstrap resampling: a powerful method of assessing confidence intervals for doses from experimental data.
    Iwi G; Millard RK; Palmer AM; Preece AW; Saunders M
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Apr; 44(4):N55-62. PubMed ID: 10232818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximate distribution of dose among foetal organs for radioiodine uptake via placenta transfer.
    Millard RK; Saunders M; Palmer AM; Preece AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2773-83. PubMed ID: 11720346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3286-300. PubMed ID: 17940997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model-based comparison of maternal and foetal organ doses from (99m)Tc pertechnetate, DMSA, DTPA, HDP, MAA and MAG(3) diagnostic intakes during pregnancy.
    Saunders M; Palmer M; Preece A; Millard R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Oct; 29(10):1365-73. PubMed ID: 12271420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
    Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal and maternal dose assessment for diagnostic scans during pregnancy.
    Motavalli LR; Hakimabad HM; Azghadi EH
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(9):3596-608. PubMed ID: 27065182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.
    Wichmann FA; Hill NJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1314-29. PubMed ID: 11800459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bootstrap estimation of confidence intervals on mutation rate ratios.
    Russell MS; March JC
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Jun; 52(5):385-96. PubMed ID: 21630358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis.
    Wedenberg M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach.
    van Dijk JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the estimation of parameter uncertainty distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models using sampling importance resampling.
    Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Harling K; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):583-596. PubMed ID: 27730482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.
    Giansante L; Martins JC; Nersissian DY; Kiers KC; Kay FU; Sawamura MVY; Lee C; Gebrim EMMS; Costa PR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):308-320. PubMed ID: 30508315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimated dose rates to members of the public from external exposure to patients with 131I thyroid treatment.
    Dewji S; Bellamy M; Hertel N; Leggett R; Sherbini S; Saba M; Eckerman K
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1851-7. PubMed ID: 25832075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of internal dose estimates obtained using organ-level, voxel S value, and Monte Carlo techniques.
    Grimes J; Celler A
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092501. PubMed ID: 25186410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional radiobiologic dosimetry: application of radiobiologic modeling to patient-specific 3-dimensional imaging-based internal dosimetry.
    Prideaux AR; Song H; Hobbs RF; He B; Frey EC; Ladenson PW; Wahl RL; Sgouros G
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Jun; 48(6):1008-16. PubMed ID: 17504874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of confidence limits for descriptive indexes derived from autoregressive analysis of time series: Methods and application to heart rate variability.
    Beda A; Simpson DM; Faes L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0183230. PubMed ID: 28968394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D calculation of absorbed dose for 131I-targeted radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study.
    Saeedzadeh E; Sarkar S; Abbaspour Tehrani-Fard A; Ay MR; Khosravi HR; Loudos G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 22069233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of bootstrap resampling performance for PET data.
    Markiewicz PJ; Reader AJ; Matthews JC
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):279-99. PubMed ID: 25490178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating individual thyroid doses for a case-control study of childhood thyroid cancer in Bryansk Oblast, Russia.
    Stepanenko VF; Voillequé PG; Gavrilin YI; Khrouch VT; Shinkarev SM; Orlov MY; Kondrashov AE; Petin DV; Iaskova EK; Tsyb AF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(2):143-60. PubMed ID: 14978294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.