101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10233500)
21. A surgical model of composite cystoplasty with cultured urothelial cells: a controlled study of gross outcome and urothelial phenotype.
Fraser M; Thomas DF; Pitt E; Harnden P; Trejdosiewicz LK; Southgate J
BJU Int; 2004 Mar; 93(4):609-16. PubMed ID: 15008741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mucin histochemistry and lectin binding sites in intestinal metaplasia of the urinary bladder.
Barresi G; Marafioti T
Histopathology; 1990 Sep; 17(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 2242849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Regenerative urinary bladder augmentation using small intestinal submucosa: urodynamic and histopathologic assessment in long-term canine bladder augmentations.
Kropp BP; Rippy MK; Badylak SF; Adams MC; Keating MA; Rink RC; Thor KB
J Urol; 1996 Jun; 155(6):2098-104. PubMed ID: 8618344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prevention of colonic mucosal regrowth after seromuscular enterocystoplasty.
Kïbar Y; Tahmaz L; Ongürü O; Dayanç M
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):2059-62. PubMed ID: 11371928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bladder reconstitution with bone marrow derived stem cells seeded on small intestinal submucosa improves morphological and molecular composition.
Chung SY; Krivorov NP; Rausei V; Thomas L; Frantzen M; Landsittel D; Kang YM; Chon CH; Ng CS; Fuchs GJ
J Urol; 2005 Jul; 174(1):353-9. PubMed ID: 15947689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa in bladder augmentation in rabbit: long-term histological outcome.
Ayyildiz A; Akgül KT; Huri E; Nuhoğlu B; Kiliçoğlu B; Ustün H; Gürdal M; Germiyanoğlu C
ANZ J Surg; 2008; 78(1-2):82-6. PubMed ID: 18199213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Bladder repair using an ileocecal segment].
Pintér J; Szokoly V; Balázs G; Varga A; Böszörményi-Nagy G
Orv Hetil; 1989 May; 130(21):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2734013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acellular bladder matrix allografts in the regeneration of functional bladders: evaluation of large-segment (> 24 cm) substitution in a porcine model.
Merguerian PA; Reddy PP; Barrieras DJ; Wilson GJ; Woodhouse K; Bagli DJ; McLorie GA; Khoury AE
BJU Int; 2000 May; 85(7):894-8. PubMed ID: 10792173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Augmentation cystoplasty using pedicled and de-epithelialized gastric patches in the mini-pig model.
Frey P; Lutz N; Leuba AL
J Urol; 1996 Aug; 156(2 Pt 2):608-13. PubMed ID: 8683742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Challenges in a larger bladder replacement with cell-seeded and unseeded small intestinal submucosa grafts in a subtotal cystectomy model.
Zhang Y; Frimberger D; Cheng EY; Lin HK; Kropp BP
BJU Int; 2006 Nov; 98(5):1100-5. PubMed ID: 17034611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Chemically induced intestinal de-epithelialization using silver nitrate for bladder augmentation.
Demirbilek S; Aydin G; Ozardali HI; Baykara S
Urol Res; 2001 Feb; 29(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11310212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Absorption of intravesically applied drugs: comparison of normal and ileal augmented rabbit bladder.
Krege S; Kinzig-Schippers M; Sörgel F; Baschek R; Michel MC; Rübben H
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):2045-50. PubMed ID: 15540786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Replacement of intestinal mucosa with urothelium in rat augmented bladders using intravesical photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolaevulinic acid.
Baig M; Miocinovic R; Keck RW; Fynes EM; Strobel SL; Kropp KA; Selman SH
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):1108-12. PubMed ID: 17644132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-term histological and mucin alterations in the neobladder mucosa following urinary bladder augmentation or substitution with gastrointestinal segment.
Kispal ZF; Kardos D; Jilling T; Kereskai L; Isaacs M; Balogh DL; Pinter AB; Till H; Vajda P
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):349.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26298391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Autologous transplantation of urothelium into demucosalized gastrointestinal segments: evidence for epithelialization and differentiation of in vitro expanded and transplanted urothelial cells.
Schaefer BM; Lorenz C; Back W; Moll R; Sun TT; Schober C; Waag KL; Kramer MD
J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 9400496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the malignant potential of cystoplasty.
Nurse DE; Mundy AR
Br J Urol; 1989 Nov; 64(5):489-92. PubMed ID: 2611620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. First prize: ureteral segmental replacement revisited.
El-Hakim A; Marcovich R; Chiu KY; Lee BR; Smith AD
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1069-74. PubMed ID: 16283842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term histopathological changes observed in rats subjected to augmentation cystoplasty.
Little JS; Klee LW; Hoover DM; Rink RC
J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 2):720-4. PubMed ID: 8022004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bladder augmentation with acellular dermal biomatrix in a diseased animal model.
Akbal C; Lee SD; Packer SC; Davis MM; Rink RC; Kaefer M
J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 2):1706-11. PubMed ID: 16945628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ureteral tissue expansion for bladder augmentation: a long-term prospective controlled trial in a porcine model.
Stifelman MD; Ikeguchi EF; Hensle TW
J Urol; 1998 Nov; 160(5):1826-9. PubMed ID: 9783968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
