These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10234127)

  • 1. Considerations for simulation-based evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG
    Blood Press Monit; 1997 Oct; 2(5):257-268. PubMed ID: 10234127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated noninvasive blood pressure measurement.
    Ng KG
    Intensive Care World; 1995 Sep; 12(3):89-102. PubMed ID: 10157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extracting oscillometric pulses from the cuff pressure: does it affect the pressures determined by oscillometric blood pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 16932036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of three oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure simulators.
    Amoore JN; Geake WB
    J Clin Eng; 1997; 22(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 10166510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the A&D UA-767 and Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs noninvasive blood pressure monitors using a blood pressure simulator.
    Davis PD; Dennis JL; Railton R
    J Hum Hypertens; 2005 Mar; 19(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 15565174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noninvasive blood pressure performance: a reproducible method for quantifying motion artifact tolerance in oscillometry.
    Van Horn RN; Kahlke RJ; Taylor LA; Dorsett TJ
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2001; 35(6):395-414. PubMed ID: 11765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of noninvasive oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in anesthetized boid snakes.
    Chinnadurai SK; Wrenn A; DeVoe RS
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2009 Mar; 234(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 19250041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the SCHILLER BR-102 plus noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the International Protocol introduced by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Denchev SV; Simova II; Matveev MG
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 17890972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.
    Bur A; Herkner H; Vlcek M; Woisetschläger C; Derhaschnig U; Delle Karth G; Laggner AN; Hirschl MM
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 12626986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of methods & simulators for evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG; Small CF
    J Clin Eng; 1992; 17(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 10124461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of femoral arterial blood pressure with radial arterial blood pressure and noninvasive upper arm blood pressure in the reperfusion period during liver transplantation.
    Shin BS; Kim GS; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Yang M; Kim CS; Hahm TS; Lee SK
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Jun; 39(5):1326-8. PubMed ID: 17580132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of electronic, digital blood pressure monitors: perceptions and ease of operation.
    Latman NS; Carroll KK; Russin R
    Med Instrum; 1985; 19(6):261-7. PubMed ID: 4079850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.