224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10234340)
1. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
Buckman R
CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
Prescrire Int; 1998 Jun; 7(35):94-5. PubMed ID: 10342930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Homeopathy; meta-analysis of a shirt-sleeve].
Offerhaus L
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Mar; 135(12):500-2. PubMed ID: 2027391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The demonstration of the efficacy of homeopathic drugs].
Strubelt O; Claussen M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Mar; 124(9):261-6. PubMed ID: 10102013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.
Evans D; Kowanko I
Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Homeopathy: increasing scientific validation.
Reilly D
Altern Ther Health Med; 2005; 11(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 15819447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review of homeopathic pathogenetic trials: an excess of rigour?
Sherr J; Quirk T
Homeopathy; 2007 Oct; 96(4):273-5; discussion 275-6, 278. PubMed ID: 17954386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Open letter in response to the article in the Lancet.
Swiss Association of Homoeopathic Physicians
Explore (NY); 2006 Jan; 2(1):7. PubMed ID: 16781599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical appraisal. 4. Questioning evidence: its validity and importance.
Thompson C
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jun; 3(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10478061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Debate regarding homeopathic medicine continues.
Imrie R
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1998 Jul; 213(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 9656014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
Moher D; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Tugwell P; Moher M; Jones A; Pham B; Klassen TP
Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(12):i-iv, 1-98. PubMed ID: 10374081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reinventing the wheel? Or the emperor's new clothes.
Oberbaum M; Vithoulkas G; van Haselen R; Singer S
J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Oct; 9(5):613-5. PubMed ID: 14629837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.
Rosner A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
Higgins PA; Straub AJ
Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy fields--grounded in reality?
Esposito L
Nurs Spectr (Wash D C); 1998 Apr; 8(8):3. PubMed ID: 10542707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
Weinmann S
Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
