224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10234340)
21. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
Bias R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards?
Frass M; Schuster E; Muchitsch I; Duncan J; Gei W; Kozel G; Kastinger-Mayr C; Felleitner AE; Reiter C; Endler C; Oberbaum M
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):780-2. PubMed ID: 16296904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Rejecting the facts.
Lépine P
Can Fam Physician; 1998 Jun; 44():1231. PubMed ID: 9640510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Is homeopathy a clinically valuable approach?
Ernst E
Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2005 Nov; 26(11):547-8. PubMed ID: 16165225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Could homeopathy find its legitimacy in the "positive" results of a meta-analysis?].
Scheen AJ
Rev Med Liege; 1997 Nov; 52(11):694-7. PubMed ID: 9480493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Keeping an open mind.
Leyton E
Can Fam Physician; 1998 Jun; 44():1231-2. PubMed ID: 9640511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Are homeopathic studies better-fated in India?
Anick DJ; Jonas W
Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd; 2001 Oct; 8(5):316-8. PubMed ID: 11760717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Healing with homeopathy. An introduction to basic tenets.
O'Brien SB
Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 May; 10(5):63-6, 103. PubMed ID: 12420532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A formal approach to the problem of reproducing experimental effects with homeopathic potencies.
Weingärtner O
J Altern Complement Med; 2009 Mar; 15(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 19250004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sir: is that bias?
Reilly D
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):785. PubMed ID: 16296907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Out of step with the Lancet homeopathy meta-analysis: more objections than objectivity?
Dean M
J Altern Complement Med; 1998; 4(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 9884176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Research on homeopathy: state of the art.
Walach H; Jonas WB; Ives J; van Wijk R; Weingärtner O
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):813-29. PubMed ID: 16296915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Priorities and methods for developing the evidence profile of homeopathy. Recommendations of the ECH general assembly and XVIII Symposium of GIRI.
Van Wassenhoven M
Homeopathy; 2005 Apr; 94(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 15892493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. We need repetition of HPTs.
Signorini A
Homeopathy; 2007 Oct; 96(4):277. PubMed ID: 17954388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reinventing the wheel will not make it rounder: controlled trials of homeopathy reconsidered.
Walach H
J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Feb; 9(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12683353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality assessment of physical research in homeopathy.
Becker-Witt C; Weisshuhn TE; Lüdtke R; Willich SN
J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Feb; 9(1):113-32. PubMed ID: 12676040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Failure to exclude false negative bias: a fundamental flaw in the trial of Shang et al.
Kiene H; Kienle GS; von Schön-Angerer T
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):783. PubMed ID: 16296905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Weighing the homeopathic evidence.
Ernst E
Homeopathy; 2003 Apr; 92(2):67-8; discussion 123. PubMed ID: 12725247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Research development in homeopathy: a question of methods and priorities.
Mathie RT
Homeopathy; 2005 Apr; 94(2):73. PubMed ID: 15892485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Finally, some light on the 'Pillar of Homeopathy'.
Signorini A
Homeopathy; 2007 Jan; 96(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17227740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
