323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10234347)
1. No impact from active dissemination of the Ottawa Ankle Rules: further evidence of the need for local implementation of practice guidelines.
Cameron C; Naylor CD
CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1165-8. PubMed ID: 10234347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Stiell IG; McKnight RD; Greenberg GH; McDowell I; Nair RC; Wells GA; Johns C; Worthington JR
JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 8114236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uptake of validated clinical practice guidelines: experience with implementing the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Holroyd BR; Wilson D; Rowe BH; Mayes DC; Noseworthy T
Am J Emerg Med; 2004 May; 22(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 15138948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of a clinical decision support tool on adherence to the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Silveira PC; Ip IK; Sumption S; Raja AS; Tajmir S; Khorasani R
Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 34(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 26682677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative analysis of ENP's and SHO's in the application of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Hopkins M
Int Emerg Nurs; 2010 Oct; 18(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 20869659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Auleley GR; Ravaud P; Giraudeau B; Kerboull L; Nizard R; Massin P; Garreau de Loubresse C; Vallée C; Durieux P
JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(24):1935-9. PubMed ID: 9200633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department.
Lau LH; Kerr D; Law I; Ritchie P
Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2013 Aug; 16(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 23953094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Radiography for Acute Ankle Injuries: A Randomized Trial.
Tajmir S; Raja AS; Ip IK; Andruchow J; Silveira P; Smith S; Khorasani R
West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 28435501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?
Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; McAuley L; Howell M; Clancy M; Durieux P; Simon N; Emparanza JI; Aginaga JR; O'connor A; Wells G
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Mar; 37(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 11223761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ankle radiograph utilization after learning a decision rule: a 12-month follow-up.
Verbeek PR; Stiell IG; Hebert G; Sellens C
Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Aug; 4(8):776-9. PubMed ID: 9262694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns.
Dowling SK; Wishart I
CJEM; 2011 Sep; 13(5):333-8; E44-6. PubMed ID: 21955415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of implementing the Ottawa ankle rules on ankle radiography requests in A&E.
Gwilym SE; Aslam N; Ribbans WJ; Holloway V
Int J Clin Pract; 2003 Sep; 57(7):625-7. PubMed ID: 14529066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of patient satisfaction and outcomes after assessment for acute ankle injuries.
Wilson DE; Noseworthy TW; Rowe BH; Holroyd BR
Am J Emerg Med; 2002 Jan; 20(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 11781906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of current local practice and the Ottawa Ankle Rules to determine the need for radiography in acute ankle injury.
Singh-Ranger G; Marathias A
Accid Emerg Nurs; 1999 Oct; 7(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10808759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric emergency physician opinions on ankle radiograph clinical decision rules.
Boutis K; Constantine E; Schuh S; Pecaric M; Stephens D; Narayanan UG
Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Jul; 17(7):709-17. PubMed ID: 20653584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of imaging guidelines on X-ray use among American provider network chiropractors: interrupted time series analysis.
Bussières AE; Sales AE; Ramsay T; Hilles SM; Grimshaw JM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1501-9. PubMed ID: 24374097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
