177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10235066)
1. The continued vitality of a patient's informed consent, or, when the patient says 'no'.
Barratt K; von Briesen JD
WMJ; 1999; 98(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 10235066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When the patient changed her mind. Schreiber v. Physicians Ins. Co.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Mar; 16(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 10346622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The question of cesarean sections.
Lewis RF
Wis Med J; 1991 Mar; 90(3):102, 105. PubMed ID: 2058165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Patient risk information within the scope of obstetrics].
Ulsenheimer K
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Jun; 55(6):M68-72. PubMed ID: 7657134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A visitation with informed consent and refusal.
Hirsh HL
Leg Med; 1995; ():147-203. PubMed ID: 8788669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Fetal hypoxia and legal consequences. A contribution to defining responsibility for documentation and assessment of findings].
Hager J
Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):390-3. PubMed ID: 2696705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Refusal of blood transfusion for religious reasons].
Ulsenheimer K
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 54(6):M83-6. PubMed ID: 8088483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Physician's duty to obtain informed consent if patients refuse indicated treatment].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Feb; 135(6):260-1. PubMed ID: 20127611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parents do not have the right to refuse to resuscitate normal newborn. Stewart-Graves v. Vaughn, 162 Wn. 2d 115, 170 P. 3d 1151 (Wash. 2008).
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2008; 28(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 23641494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent issues throughout the birthing process.
Woolery W
J Leg Med; 2000 Jun; 21(2):241-55. PubMed ID: 10911697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Uterine rupture among women with a prior cesarean delivery.
Magee BD
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 11806382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Uterine rupture among women with a prior cesarean delivery.
Koroukian SM
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 11806381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus?
Cady RF
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perinatal malpractice. Risks and prevention.
Nocon JJ; Coolman DA
J Reprod Med; 1987 Feb; 32(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 3560083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VBAC: protecting patients, defending doctors.
Deutchman M; Roberts RG
Am Fam Physician; 2003 Mar; 67(5):931-2, 935-6. PubMed ID: 12643352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse and the law. Informed consent and self-determination.
Langslow A
Aust Nurses J; 1992 Aug; 22(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 1445015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin.
Ketler SK
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mothers and doctors' orders: unmasking the doctor's fiduciary role in maternal-fetal conflicts.
Oberman M
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2000; 94(2):451-501. PubMed ID: 12455556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Legal comment on refusal of blood transfusions].
Bock RW
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1996 Oct; 31(8):506-7. PubMed ID: 9019186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
