These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10235070)

  • 1. CEOP treatment results and validity of the International Prognostic Index in Chinese patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Chim CS; Kwong YL; Lie AK; Lee CK; Liang R
    Hematol Oncol; 1998 Sep; 16(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 10235070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cooperative study of epirubicin with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (CEOP) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Lambertenghi Deliliers G; Butti C; Baldini L; Ceriani A; Lombardi F; Luoni M; Montalbetti L; Pavia G; Pinotti G; Pogliani E
    Haematologica; 1995; 80(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 7590500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CEOP-B/VIMB vs. promace-CytaBOM in the treatment of intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A randomised multicenter study of Southern Italy Cooperative Group.
    Lorusso V; Palmieri G; Bianco AR; Abate G; Catalano G; De Vita F; Dammacco F; Lauta VM; Lucarelli G; Polimeno G; Mantovani G; D'Aprile M; Marzullo F; De Lena M
    Int J Oncol; 2000 Jan; 16(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 10601560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CEOP-B alternated with VIMB in intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study.
    De Lena M; Ditonno P; Lorusso V; Brandi M; Timurian A; Marzullo F; Ventrella V; Pellecchia A
    J Clin Oncol; 1995 Apr; 13(4):953-60. PubMed ID: 7535844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Analysis of prognostic factors by the international index and by lactic dehydrogenase in an intergroup study.
    Gordon LI; Andersen J; Colgan J; Glick J; Resnick GD; O'Connell M; Cassileth PA
    Cancer; 1995 Feb; 75(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 7530168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phase II study of cyclophosphamide,epirubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and etoposide (CEOP-E) for aggressive non-Hodgkin 's lymphoma.
    Kim JG; Sohn SK; Kim DH; Baek JH; Park TI; Lee KB
    J Korean Med Sci; 2004 Dec; 19(6):820-5. PubMed ID: 15608392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CEOP versus CNOP.
    Economopoulos T; Dimopoulos MA; Mellou S; Pavlidis N; Samantas E; Nicolaides C; Tsatalas C; Papadopoulos A; Papageogriou E; Papasavvas P; Fountzilas G
    Eur J Haematol; 2002 Mar; 68(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 12068793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Fisher RI; Gaynor ER; Dahlberg S; Oken MM; Grogan TM; Mize EM; Glick JH; Coltman CA; Miller TP
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Apr; 328(14):1002-6. PubMed ID: 7680764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with the ProMACE- CytaBOM protocol].
    Mihaljević B; Jancić-Nedeljkov R; Sretenović M; Milivojević G; Janković S; Petrović M
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(9-10):345-8. PubMed ID: 9863405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone versus intensive chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Fisher RI
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 1997; 40 Suppl():S42-6. PubMed ID: 9272133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MACOP-B versus ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.
    Sertoli MR; Santini G; Chisesi T; Congiu AM; Rubagotti A; Contu A; Salvagno L; Coser P; Porcellini A; Vespignani M
    J Clin Oncol; 1994 Jul; 12(7):1366-74. PubMed ID: 7517442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epirubicin (CEOP-Bleo) versus idaurubicin (CIOP-Bleo) in the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: dose escalation studies.
    Avilés A; Nambo MJ; Talavera A; Garcia EL; Huerta-Guzman J; Díaz Maqueo JC
    Anticancer Drugs; 1997 Nov; 8(10):937-42. PubMed ID: 9436636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with dose-intensified epirubicin in combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CEOP-100): a phase II study.
    Basaran M; Bavbek ES; Sakar B; Eralp Y; Alici S; Tas F; Yaman F; Dogan O O; Camlica H; Onat H
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2001 Dec; 24(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 11801756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study.
    Fisher RI; Gaynor ER; Dahlberg S; Oken MM; Grogan TM; Mize EM; Glick JH; Coltman CA; Miller TP
    Ann Oncol; 1994; 5 Suppl 2():91-5. PubMed ID: 7515652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A phase III randomized trial of high-dose CEOP + filgrastim versus standard-dose CEOP in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 10-year follow-up data: Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) NHL07 trial.
    Hertzberg M; Matthews JP; Stone JM; Dubosq MC; Grigg A; Ellis D; Benson W; Browett P; Horvath N; Januszewicz H; Abdi E; Green M; Bonaventura A; Marlton P; Cannell P; Wolf M;
    Am J Hematol; 2014 May; 89(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 24481640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A phase II trial of ProMACE-CytaBOM in previously untreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of intermediate- or high-grade histology.
    Rossi G; Mariano MR; Arcangeli G; Bonfanti V; Capucci MA; Ferremi P; Marpicati P; Meriggi F; Zaniboni A; Izzi T
    Hematol Oncol; 1991; 9(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 1718837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of CHOP-B vs CEOP-B in 'poor prognosis' non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. A randomized trial.
    De Lena M; Maiello E; Lorusso V; Brandi M; Calabrese P; Romito S; Mazzei A; Marzullo F
    Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother; 1989; 6(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 2473364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [CEOP regimen in the treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].
    Huang HQ; Lin XB; Pan ZH; Bu Q; Gao Y; Wang BF; Cai QQ; Xia ZJ; Xu RH; Jiang WQ; Guan ZZ
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 May; 29(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 17892140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective randomized study comparing MEMID with a chop-like regimen in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Chamorey E; Gressin R; Peyrade F; Rossi JF; Lepeu G; Foussard C; Harrousseau JL; Fabbro M; Richard B; Delwail V; Maisonneuve H; Vilque JP; Thyss A
    Oncology; 2005; 69(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16088231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized EPOCH vs. CHOP front-line therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: long-term results.
    Khaled HM; Zekri ZK; Mokhtar N; Ali NM; Darwish T; Elattar I; Gaafar R; Moawad MS
    Ann Oncol; 1999 Dec; 10(12):1489-92. PubMed ID: 10643541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.