These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10235548)

  • 1. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; Hancock SA; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1152-61. PubMed ID: 10235548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma].
    Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kook MS; Yang SJ; Kim S; Chung J; Kim ST; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical aspects of the normal visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Cubbidge RP; Pacey IE; Robinson R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 39(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 9430545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?
    Conway ML; Hosking SL; Zhu H; Cubbidge RP
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast for following visual fields in prepubertal idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Stiebel-Kalish H; Lusky M; Yassur Y; Kalish Y; Shuper A; Erlich R; Lubman S; Snir M
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1673-5. PubMed ID: 15350321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mild learning effect of short-wavelength automated perimetry using SITA program.
    Fogagnolo P; Tanga L; Rossetti L; Oddone F; Manni G; Orzalesi N; Centofanti M
    J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 19855293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Glass E; Schaumberger M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1847-54. PubMed ID: 7635658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population.
    Akar Y; Yilmaz A; Yucel I
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18617757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical experiences with the "Swedish interactive threshold algorithm" (SITA)].
    Remky A; Arend O
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Mar; 216(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 10773977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal intersubject threshold variability and normal limits of the SITA SWAP and full threshold SWAP perimetric programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):5029-34. PubMed ID: 14578431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.