189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10236716)
1. Living wills--moral directive can cause legal dilemma.
Philipps KA
Hosp Med Staff; 1978 May; 7(5):20-3. PubMed ID: 10236716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal status of 'no code orders'.
Memel SL; Lemkin JW
Hosp Med Staff; 1978 May; 7(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 10306909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Right-to-die laws: creating, not clarifying, problems.
Horan DJ
Hosp Prog; 1978 Jun; 59(6):62-5, 78. PubMed ID: 649133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. Optimizing rights and limiting liability.
Gilfix M; Raffin TA
West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 6506679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anderson v. St. Francis-St. George Hospital: wrongful living from an American and Jewish legal perspective.
Pollack D; Steinmetz C; Lens V
Clevel State Law Rev; 1997; 45(4):621-37. PubMed ID: 11660802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Natural death' laws cause hospitals few problems.
Friedman E
Hospitals; 1978 May; 52(10):124, 126, 128-30 passim. PubMed ID: 640604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enforcement problems arising from conflicting views of living wills in the legal, medical and patient communities.
Webster P
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2001; 62(4):793-813. PubMed ID: 12774779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The living will-where it stands.
Geriatr Nurs; 1985; 6(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 3843824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill.
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Oct; 49(10):375. PubMed ID: 2272806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Michigan's sensible "living will".
Relman AS
N Engl J Med; 1979 May; 300(22):1270-2. PubMed ID: 431686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawing life support: a legal assessment and a possible response.
Blum JD
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Apr; 13(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 10266235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Living wills: personal and professional perspectives. Death at a New York hospital.
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):260-82. PubMed ID: 3854892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Florida law creates artificial sustenance dilemma.
Whiteneck MR
Health Prog; 1985 Nov; 66(9):36-9. PubMed ID: 10311349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Living with death: some legal considerations.
Cohen KP
Fam Community Health; 1979 Nov; 2(3):1-16. PubMed ID: 10244129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When your patient has (or wants) a living will.
Patient Care; 1979 Sep; 13(15):208-10. PubMed ID: 10243655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Indiana's Living Wills and Life-Prolonging Procedures Act: a reform proposal.
Mooney CA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(2):539-58. PubMed ID: 11649962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicine and the law.
MD; 1979 Jan; 23(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 10297311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
