These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10238025)
21. Act 817 of 1979: Arkansas' new involuntary commitment law. Faulkner LR J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Apr; 76(11):457-63. PubMed ID: 6445353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Crosscurrents of law and medicine. Stone A MD; 1979 Jan; 23(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 10239851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The ethical, medical, and legal implications of the forcible treatment provisions of the Criminal Code. Hewak N Health Law Can; 1995; 15(4):107-16. PubMed ID: 10143461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Has the Pennsylvania legislature over-reacted in setting standards for involuntary commitment of mentally ill persons. Rothman DA; Rothman NL Pa Nurse; 1978 Feb; 33(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 247270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's. Perlin ML Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Legal aspects of psychiatry in Soviet legislation]. Babayan EA Quad Criminol Clin; 1977; 19(4):417-43. PubMed ID: 614598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. "We're only trying to help": the burden and standard of proof in short-term civil commitment. Henderson LN Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 31(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 10240958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [It is extremely important to maintain legal rights in cases of forcible restraint]. Sturkell CE Lakartidningen; 1976 Sep; 73(36):2891. PubMed ID: 966856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Psychiatry, sociology and civil liberties. Dunham HW Man Med; 1977; 2(4):263-74. PubMed ID: 10316583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A right to treatment. Martin A Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(42):1620-1. PubMed ID: 928100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Legal and medical criteria with respect to deprival of freedom of movement in mental patients (author's transl)]. Hess M Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1980 Aug; 42(8):520-2. PubMed ID: 6450368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The two-edged sword. Smith WB JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(21):2327. PubMed ID: 490835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Civil Rights litigation and mental health: section 1983. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 May; 32(5):305-6. PubMed ID: 7239454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research? Davoli JI Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Where involuntary commitment, civil liberties, and the right to mental health care collide: an overview of California's mental illness system. Karasch M Hastings Law J; 2003 Jan; 54(2):493-523. PubMed ID: 15287113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]