These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10238569)

  • 1. The University of California v. Bakke: a murky future.
    Bork RH
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 10238569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The University of California v. Bakke: conversation with a dean of admissions.
    Marshall B
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):39. PubMed ID: 10238570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The University of California v. Bakke: the court's three decisions.
    Sindler AP
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):15-23. PubMed ID: 10238565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. After Bakke many questions are left unanswered.
    Graumann FW; Lippman ME
    Hospitals; 1978 Nov; 52(22):73-5. PubMed ID: 700653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The University of California v. Bakke: reparations are justified for blacks.
    Jackson J
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 10238566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bakke v. The University of California.
    Bonham GW
    Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):18, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10236159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ethical questions involved in the upcoming Bakke case decision.
    Bristow LR
    Forum Med; 1978 May; 1(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 10236756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backing into Bakke.
    Health PAC Bull; 1977 Jun; (76):4-5. PubMed ID: 10236351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical school admissions: the case for a quota.
    Geiger HJ; Sidel VW
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Oct; 8(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 721434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: must medical school admissions programs be "color-blind"?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1977 Nov; 66(11):907-8. PubMed ID: 925541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A legal perspective on the Bakke decision.
    Tallent SE
    Pers J; 1979 May; 58(5):296-302, 325. PubMed ID: 10241468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Affirmative action and the Bakke case.
    Scala B
    Adm Manage; 1977 Dec; 38(12):26-7, 65. PubMed ID: 10236089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bakke v. The University of California. Viewpoint 1: the case for preference.
    Daniels L; Farmer FE
    Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):19, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10236160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bakke: not a black and white decision.
    Looney WF
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Aug; 6(8):37-40. PubMed ID: 703479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bakke v. The University of California. Viewpoint 2: the case against preference.
    Sherman MJ
    Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):19, 60-1. PubMed ID: 10323901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The University of California v. Bakke: landmark or curiosity?
    Sowell T
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):30-4. PubMed ID: 10238567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In search of a just outcome.
    Fitt AB
    Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):22-5, 59. PubMed ID: 10236161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The University of California v. Bakke: questions for the court.
    Novak M
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10238568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bakke vs. Univ. of California: pure and simple..
    Johnson ET
    Urban Health; 1977 Apr; 6(3):6. PubMed ID: 10235887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. After Bakke, what?
    Alexis CP
    JAMA; 1978 Sep; 240(9):831-2. PubMed ID: 671726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.