These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1023863)

  • 1. Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance.
    Schleger AV; Lincoln DT; McKenna RV; Kemp DH; Roberts JA
    Aust J Biol Sci; 1976 Dec; 29(5-6):499-512. PubMed ID: 1023863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinetics of mast cell, basophil and eosinophil populations at Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum feeding sites on cattle and the acquisition of resistance.
    Gill HS
    Parasitology; 1986 Oct; 93 ( Pt 2)():305-15. PubMed ID: 3785971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Franzin AM; Maruyama SR; Garcia GR; Oliveira RP; Ribeiro JM; Bishop R; Maia AA; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; Santos IK
    Parasit Vectors; 2017 Jan; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 28143523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Boophilus microplus: the effect of host resistance on larval attachments and growth.
    Kemp DH; Koudstaal D; Roberts JA; Kerr JD
    Parasitology; 1976 Aug; 73(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 987568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histology of bovine skin reactions to Ixodes holocyclus Neumann.
    Allen JR; Doube BM; Kemp DH
    Can J Comp Med; 1977 Jan; 41(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 832186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dermal mast cell counts in F2 Holstein x Gir crossbred cattle artificially infested with the tick Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae).
    Engracia Filho JR; Bechara GH; Teodoro RL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Oct; 1081():476-8. PubMed ID: 17135554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulation of cutaneous inflammation induced by ticks in contrasting phenotypes of infestation in bovines.
    Carvalho WA; Franzin AM; Abatepaulo AR; de Oliveira CJ; Moré DD; da Silva JS; Ferreira BR; de Miranda Santos IK
    Vet Parasitol; 2010 Feb; 167(2-4):260-73. PubMed ID: 19836891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bovine resistance to Amblyomma americanum ticks: an acquired immune response characterized by cutaneous basophil infiltrates.
    Brown SJ; Barker RW; Askenase PW
    Vet Parasitol; 1984 Oct; 16(1-2):147-65. PubMed ID: 6543047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Boophilus microplus: passive transfer of resistance in cattle.
    Roberts JA; Kerr JD
    J Parasitol; 1976 Jun; 62(3):485-8. PubMed ID: 932924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between the resistance of crossbred cattle to ticks, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) and Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (Koch, 1844).
    Miranpuri GS
    Vet Parasitol; 1989 Jun; 31(3-4):289-301. PubMed ID: 2763448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Robbertse L; Richards SA; Clift SJ; Barnard AC; Leisewitz A; Crafford JE; Maritz-Olivier C
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2018 May; 9(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 29622516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resistance of Holstein-Friesian cows to infestation by the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus).
    Jonsson NN; Matschoss AL; Pepper P; Green PE; Ansell J
    Vet Parasitol; 2000 May; 89(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 10799843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle.
    Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Boophilus microplus: rejection of larvae from British breed cattle.
    Koudstaal D; Kemp DH; Kerr JD
    Parasitology; 1978 Jun; 76(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 662415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A putative role for eosinophils in tick rejection.
    Schleger AV; Lincoln DT; Kemp DH
    Experientia; 1981 Jan; 37(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 7202667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the effect of two regimens of infestation on the development of resistance by cattle to the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Can.).
    Hewetson RW; Lewis IJ
    J Parasitol; 1976 Apr; 62(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 944256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Jonsson NN; Piper EK; Constantinoiu CC
    Parasite Immunol; 2014 Nov; 36(11):553-9. PubMed ID: 25313455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Immunologic relations between cattle and ticks, specifically between cattle and Boophilus microplus].
    Brossard M
    Acta Trop; 1976; 33(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 13630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arteriovenous anastomoses in the dermal vasculature of the skin of Bos taurus cattle, and their relationship with resistance to the tick, Boophilus microplus.
    Schleger AV; Lincoln DT; Bourne AS
    Aust J Biol Sci; 1981; 34(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7259631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavior of larvae of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini), on cattle of differing degrees of resistance.
    Roberts JA
    J Parasitol; 1971 Jun; 57(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 5090974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.