227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10238890)
1. More on Bakke.
Sweigert WT
Pers Adm; 1978 Oct; 23(10):6-8. PubMed ID: 10238890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Equal employment opportunities in hospitals.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1978 Sep; 52(17):40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 669655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. After Bakke many questions are left unanswered.
Graumann FW; Lippman ME
Hospitals; 1978 Nov; 52(22):73-5. PubMed ID: 700653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Feds checking for 'glass ceilings'.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1993 Nov; 23(46):88. PubMed ID: 10129923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The 'bottom line' after Connecticut v. Teal.
Blumrosen AW
Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):572-86. PubMed ID: 10259398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Court acceptance of Uniform Guidelines provisions: the bottom line and the search for alternatives.
Thompson DE; Christiansen PS
Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):587-602. PubMed ID: 10259399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comment on the Bakke decision.
Norton EH
Pers Adm; 1978 Aug; 23(8):26-8. PubMed ID: 10308518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Excluding women from certain jobs because of reproductive or fetal hazard must be justified by objective, scientific evidence.
Sculnick MW
Employ Relat Today; 1989; 16(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 10295775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of legal challenges to personnel testing.
Hinkel AL
J Ment Health Adm; 1981; 8(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10252025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New directions in EEO guidelines.
Robertson DE
Pers J; 1978 Jul; 57(7):360-3, 394. PubMed ID: 10307770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quotas for equal opportunity in employment.
Swanson SC
Pers Adm; 1978 Apr; 23(4):51-4. PubMed ID: 10307078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues in hiring the handicapped: a positive outlook.
Strom LJ; Ferris GR
Pers Adm; 1982 Aug; 27(8):75-81. PubMed ID: 10317266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An EEO examination of employment applications.
Miller EC
Pers Adm; 1980 Mar; 25(3):63-9, 81. PubMed ID: 10245591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sexual harassment in employment.
Linenberger P; Keaveny TJ
Hum Resour Manage; 1981; 20(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10251767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrimination--some answers.
Kemp JD
Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(18):56. PubMed ID: 157319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative selection procedures and the Uniform Guidelines: improving the quality of employer investigations.
Florkowski GW
Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):603-17. PubMed ID: 10259400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A businessman's view of the Privacy Commission's employment recommendations.
Kanutz AH
Pers Adm; 1978 Apr; 23(4):55-7. PubMed ID: 10307079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal protections for employees with AIDS.
Cihon P
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1988; 10(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10318109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Burger Court and the prima facie case in employment discrimination litigation: a critique.
Friedman JW
Cornell Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 65(1):1-56. PubMed ID: 10245114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Affirmative action for the handicapped and veterans: interpretative and operational guidelines.
Jackson DP
Labor Law J; 1978 Feb; 29(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 10316607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
