These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10239066)
1. Physician advertising: the first amendment and the Sherman Act. Canby WC; Gellhorn E Duke Law J; 1978 May; (2):543-85. PubMed ID: 10239066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Are you caught up in a conspiracy against competition? Chapman S Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Feb; 7(2):43-6. PubMed ID: 431276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Case study--FTC vs. AMA. Stratton DJ Assoc Manage; 1979 Jan; 31(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 10239940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What the FTC ruling on medical competition means to you. Chapman S Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Feb; 7(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 431277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Professional directories--but not commercial advertising--as a public service. Relman AS N Engl J Med; 1978 Aug; 299(9):476-8. PubMed ID: 355885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. American Medical Association; prohibited trade practices, and affirmative corrective actions--Federal Trade Commission. Final order. Fed Regist; 1979 Nov; 44(218):64803-4. PubMed ID: 10244089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician-ownership in pharmacies and drug repackagers. Hoffer GE Inquiry; 1975 Mar; 12(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 123219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why the FTC has declared war on doctors. Peck RL Med Econ; 1979 Aug; 56(16):29-30, 32, 37-8 passim. PubMed ID: 10247826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antitrust and medical ethics. Hirsh BD JAMA; 1983 Nov; 250(20):2759-60. PubMed ID: 6644949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The antitrust laws and professional discipline in medicine. Grad FP Duke Law J; 1978 May; (2):443-86. PubMed ID: 10273098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Business ethics. Lavin JH Med Econ; 1979 Mar; 56(5):229-33, 237-40. PubMed ID: 10240634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician advertising--what is legal? What is ethical? What is acceptable? Porter S Ohio State Med J; 1984 Jun; 80(6):437-9, 443. PubMed ID: 6462586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Student rally. Med school attendees write ethics code on drug firms. Romano M Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(19):24, 26. PubMed ID: 12038157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Concerning the case of American Pharmaceutical Association and Michigan State Pharmaceutical Association. Miles WA Am Pharm; 1989 Aug; NS29(8):33-5. PubMed ID: 2782242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. American Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and the New Haven County Medical Association, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission. Decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: October 7, 1980. Conn Med; 1980 Dec; 44(12):801-6. PubMed ID: 7449374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Concerning the Case of United States v. American Pharmaceutical Association and Michigan state Pharmaceutical Association Civil No. G75-558, CA5, W.D. Michigan. Apple WS Am Pharm; 1983 Aug; NS23(8):54-6. PubMed ID: 6624641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Concerning the case of United States v. American Pharmaceutical Association and Michigan State Pharmaceutical Association Civil No. G75-558, CA5, W.D. Michigan. Schlegel JF Am Pharm; 1984 Aug; NS24(8):74-6. PubMed ID: 6486017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advertising by physicians (Federal Trade Commission attacks principles of medical ethics). Huff JW J Med Assoc Ga; 1976 May; 65(5):163-4. PubMed ID: 932583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Concerning the case of United States v. American Pharmaceutical Association and Michigan State Pharmaceutical Association, civil no. G75-558 CA5, W.D. Michigan. Apple WS Am Pharm; 1981 Aug; NS21(8):55-7. PubMed ID: 7270424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]