268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10239067)
1. The McCarran-Ferguson Act's antitrust exemption for insurance: language, history and policy.
Weller CD
Duke Law J; 1978 May; (2):587-643. PubMed ID: 10239067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Group life & Health Insurance Co. v. Royal Drug Co.: the McCarran-Ferguson Act and Health Service Plans.
Szabo DS
Am J Law Med; 1980; 5(4):393-413. PubMed ID: 7377202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hammering back at the insurance industry.
Tabas AM; Tolin SA
J Patient Acc Manage; 1980 Jan; ():10-3. PubMed ID: 10245929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health insurance litigation.
Jaffe AH
J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Aug; 24(8):233-9. PubMed ID: 10113000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health Maintenance Organizations and the McCarran-Ferguson Act.
Schmidt S
Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):437-67. PubMed ID: 7102680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Federal antitrust exemption, state laws combine to protect insurers.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc; 1982 Feb; 12(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 10254275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Business of insurance and antitrust: some case history.
Weissburg C; Waxman JM
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 10252197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health insurance industry shouldn't be exempt from antitrust laws.
Goldberg LG; Greenberg W
Healthspan; 1991 May; 8(5):3-9. PubMed ID: 10111989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Antitrust risks in health insurance, staff boycotts, and shared services.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1980 Jul; 54(13):33-4,82. PubMed ID: 7390432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An antitrust exemption for commercial insurers? Answer: no.
Goldberg LG; Greenberg W
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(1):84, 87. PubMed ID: 10265081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "New" York state of mind.
Smoller BM
Md Med; 2009; 10(1):4. PubMed ID: 19388397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. No future guarantees for self-insured plans.
Feezor A
Bus Health; 1987 Apr; 4(6):16-9. PubMed ID: 10281226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. PAs take on the reimbursement bureaucracy.
Stalker T; Joyner SL
Physician Assist Health Pract; 1979 Dec; 3(12):36-8, 40, 42. PubMed ID: 10314497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ERISA preemption of state mandated-provider laws.
McDonough RS
Duke Law J; 1985 Dec; (6):1194-216. PubMed ID: 10276650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective appeals procedures.
Henriksen GA
Mich Hosp; 1980 Aug; 16(8):13-4, 20. PubMed ID: 10297928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Insurance companies and McCarran-Ferguson Act--the ADA position.
Umeda GT
Hawaii Dent J; 2009; 40(5):4-6, 11. PubMed ID: 20415093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent supreme court antitrust rulings in health care.
Podell LB
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Apr; 40(4):639-41. PubMed ID: 6846375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hit govt. recovery of vet care cost.
Fisher MJ
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1979 Sep; 83(38):2, 38. PubMed ID: 10243640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Third-party reimbursement programs--Are they immune from antitrust attack?
Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1978 Nov; 67(11):941-3. PubMed ID: 712270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Durenburger's finance subcommittee will foster more health competition.
Simler SL
Mod Healthc; 1981 Feb; 11(2):24. PubMed ID: 10250303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
