These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10239592)
1. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Carroll PR Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases. Buchanan A Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman. Baron CH Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient? Ramsey P Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient. Norris JA Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court's guidelines on incompetent patients compromise their rights. Connery JR Hosp Prog; 1980 Sep; 61(9):46-9. PubMed ID: 10248004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Who "pulls the plug:" the practical effect of the Saikewicz decision. Dunn LJ Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 10240214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint. Relman AS Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I. Suber DG; Tabor WJ JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience. Thomson CJ Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired. Beresford HR Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal models for the treatment of the terminally ill. Dunn LJ Trustee; 1979 May; 32(5):7-8, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10242400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices. Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life-sustaining treatment: the physician's role in decision-making. Walker C Geriatrics; 1992 Jan; 47(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 1729148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Judicial postponement of death recognition: the tragic case of Mary O'Connor. Gindes D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):301-31. PubMed ID: 2513713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die? Denbo SM Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision-making with psychiatrically impaired patients. A collaborative endeavor. Grant R; Steel EK Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 13(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 2179904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical decision making for the incompetent patient. Drane JF; Roth RB Health Prog; 1987 Dec; 68(10):37-42. PubMed ID: 10285412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]