These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10239889)

  • 21. Accumulated sick leave cannot be used for maternity.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Sep; 32(3):70. PubMed ID: 10304849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Another compliance challenge for employers: The Retirement Equity Act.
    Mazo JF
    Personnel; 1985 Feb; 62(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 10270452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pregnancy laws guard working women's rights.
    Nabhan DM
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Jan; 16(1):60, 62. PubMed ID: 10123529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Maternity and employment benefits in the United States - where are we now?
    McFarlane DR
    Women Health; 1976; 1(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 10236579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lack of insurance coverage for prescription contraception by an otherwise comprehensive plan as a violation of Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act--stretching the statute too far.
    Backmeyer ER
    Indiana Law Rev; 2004; 37(2):437-66. PubMed ID: 16211763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex discrimination and insurance for contraception.
    Law SA
    Wash Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 73(2):363-402. PubMed ID: 12465638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
    Sfikas EM
    CDS Rev; 1998; 91(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 9760893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interpreting the new sexual harassment guidelines.
    Hoyman M; Robinson R
    Pers J; 1980 Dec; 59(12):996-1000. PubMed ID: 10249194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sexual harassment in the health care workplace.
    Hirsh HL
    Nurs Homes; 1981; 30(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 10283829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sexual harassment: the most sensitive subject in foodservice.
    Schuster K
    Food Manage; 1981 Feb; 16(2):34-6, 38-9, 60 passim. PubMed ID: 10250028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Facing reality: the Pregnancy Discrimination Act falls short for women undergoing infertility treatment.
    Cushing K
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2010; 40(4):1697-731. PubMed ID: 21280392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. AIDS: employer concerns and options.
    Ritter DB; Turner R
    Labor Law J; 1987 Feb; 38(2):67-83. PubMed ID: 10317858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Aiello" application again rejected in maternity plea.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 May; 29(11):56. PubMed ID: 1244041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High court postpones sex-discrimination-in-maternity-benefits case.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Jul; 31(1):5. PubMed ID: 1037562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Supreme Court dismisses Wetzel discrimination-in-maternity-benefits case.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 May; 30(11):14. PubMed ID: 1037540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Insurance: exclusion of contraception found discriminatory by EEOC.
    Netter W
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 11521259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health maintenance organizations; procedures for enforcement of employer compliance.
    Fed Regist; 1979 May; 44(105):31046-7. PubMed ID: 10241577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. GE loses Title VII appeal: court rules discrimination.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Aug; 30(2):6. PubMed ID: 1244065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conflict in district courts on "Aiello" application to Title VII maternity issues.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Jan; 29(7):24-5. PubMed ID: 1244050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.