122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10239950)
1. Australia and America: making the same mistakes?
Sutherland HD
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1979 Feb; 64(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 10239950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cleveland's physicians say no to Canadian-style health care.
Lefton D
CMAJ; 1990 Nov; 143(9):918-21. PubMed ID: 2224722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Overview of a system poised for change.
Kearney BJ
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10125934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. By the London post. A visit of exploration.
Lister J
N Engl J Med; 1978 Jan; 298(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 619260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Australia's health 1996.
Aust Health Rev; 1996; 19(4):147-8. PubMed ID: 10165294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Financing surgical care: an international overview: Australia.
Rank BK
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1975 May; 60(5):14-7. PubMed ID: 10236863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Key points of reform of the German health service 2003+. From the viewpoint of the Society of Private Practice Accounting Services].
Urologe A; 2003 Jan; 42(1):136-8. PubMed ID: 14655650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should Canadian physicians support parallel private health care?
Bhatia S; Natsheh A
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):901-2. PubMed ID: 16217115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Presidential musings: prescriptions for the nation.
Kondro W
CMAJ; 2007 Sep; 177(7):707-9. PubMed ID: 17717105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NHI impact on nonprofit hospitals.
Coburn AS
Hosp Prog; 1974 Dec; 55(12):46-9. PubMed ID: 4473421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reform options in the GKV].
Schwartz FW
Chirurg; 2000 Jul; 71(7):suppl 166-70. PubMed ID: 10986611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health care in Austria. Universal access, national health insurance, and private health care.
Bennett CL; Schwarz B; Marberger M
JAMA; 1993 Jun; 269(21):2789-94. PubMed ID: 8492408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Australia revamps its health insurance program.
Hosp Adm Can; 1976 Sep; 18(9):14, 17. PubMed ID: 10308899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicine in Japan: a complex mixture of the old and new.
Boston L
Am Med News; 1978 Sep; 21(37):7-10. PubMed ID: 10238401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Public versus private: the medical resident perspective.
Hoyt B
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):898-9. PubMed ID: 16217114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. CMA proposes options for private-public split.
Kondro W; Sibbald B
CMAJ; 2006 Jul; 175(1):18. PubMed ID: 16818894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. National health insurance: the debacle Down Under.
Lavin JH
Med Econ; 1981 Feb; 58(3):41-2, 47-8, 52 passim. PubMed ID: 10249797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Chaoulli decision: a debate in which physicians must be heard.
Ouellet R
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):896. PubMed ID: 16217113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comment on the response from Graham Wright.
Butler J
Aust Health Rev; 2003; 26(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 15485366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. For most doctors practicing under National Health Insurance in Canada, the pros outweigh the cons.
Spaulding WB
Forum Med; 1980 May; 3(5):347. PubMed ID: 10246694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
