These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10240214)
21. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part II. Solnick PB Med Law; 1985; 4(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 4038531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases. Buchanan A Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The discontinuation of "extraordinary" medical treatment from a terminal patient: a physician's civil liability in New York. Giancola PJ Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 26(3):326-54. PubMed ID: 6155590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In re guardianship of Doe. Avila D Issues Law Med; 1993; 8(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 8463078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II. Suber DG; Tabor WJ JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(19):2431-2. PubMed ID: 7131695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Law and public policy. The case for the courts. Baron C J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):734-8. PubMed ID: 6481052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I. Solnick PB Med Law; 1984; 3(4):309-32. PubMed ID: 6541741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Who shall live, who shall die. Who decides? Hirsh HL; Cuneo MK Med Law; 1986; 5(2):111-50. PubMed ID: 3713456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The ethics of withholding and withdrawing critical care. Sanders LM; Raffin TA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 8293207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado. Albert LA J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Discontinuing nutrition support: a review of the case law. Dresser R J Am Diet Assoc; 1985 Oct; 85(10):1289-92. PubMed ID: 3930592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Quinlan, Saikewicz, and now Brother Fox. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Jun; 10(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 7204007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In re Donald McCarthy. Harburg M Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 7960666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Rights of the terminally ill patient. Hodgson J Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):169-91. PubMed ID: 10164517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. For them rather than by them. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6):30-1. PubMed ID: 8307744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices. Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts. Mariner WK J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The duty to care--the right to refuse. Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision making. Garwin M J Leg Med; 1998 Mar; 19(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 9564096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. What actually happened: an informed review of the Linares incident. Goldman GM; Stratton KM; Brown MD Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 2628644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]