These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10240637)
1. As the trustbusters see it, everything doctors do is wrong. Paxton HT Med Econ; 1979 Mar; 56(5):37, 39, 42 passim. PubMed ID: 10240637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. FTC charges MDs control Blue Shield. Am Med News; 1979 May; 22(20):2. PubMed ID: 10242441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Health maintenance organizations and the role of antitrust law. Kissam PC Duke Law J; 1978 May; (2):487-541. PubMed ID: 10239065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Washington believes it can control medical costs by reducing influence of doctors in Blue Shields. Schorr B Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1979 Mar; 59(103):40. PubMed ID: 10240386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Blue Shield ordered to repay withheld funds. Gosfield AG Pa Med; 1984 Jul; 87(7):34-5. PubMed ID: 6548007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On "FTC Sings the Blues" and its respondents. Weller CD J Health Polit Policy Law; 1982; 7(2):547-58. PubMed ID: 7108176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Doctors vs. Blue Shield: the first big battle. Enright SB Med Econ; 1978 Nov; 55(25):23, 27-9, 32. PubMed ID: 10239446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medico-legal brief: MD wins suit against Blue Shield. J Miss State Med Assoc; 1982 Sep; 23(9):263. PubMed ID: 7131553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue. Burda D Hospitals; 1986 Nov; 60(21):36. PubMed ID: 3770662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Blues interfered illegally with HMO.". Burda D Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(24):12. PubMed ID: 10284683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. FTC eyes ban of M.D. input into HMOs, Blues. Mod Healthc; 1979 Dec; 9(12):32. PubMed ID: 503022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plan contracts with providers: cost containment objectives amid conflicting legislative schemes. Heitler G; Ader M J Leg Med; 1981 Sep; 2(3):265-96. PubMed ID: 6976401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical restraints among hospitals, physicians and health insurers that raise rivals' costs. A case study of Reazin v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. and Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island. Baker JB Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(2-3):147-69. PubMed ID: 3245541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans: Federal Trade Commission. Notice of initiation of case-by-case law enforcement program. Fed Regist; 1981 May; 46(98):27768-9. PubMed ID: 10251259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A reexamination of medical society control of Blue Shield plans. Arnould RJ; DeBrock LM Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1984; 5():29-55. PubMed ID: 10272994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. FTC is cautious about health-plan rule on eve of Senate debate of agency power. Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1980 Feb; 60(80):14. PubMed ID: 10245673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Adding a dose of competition to the health care industry. Iglehart JK Natl J (Wash); 1978 Oct; 10(40):1602-6. PubMed ID: 10238422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of medical society control of Blue Shield on fees in the physician service market: some preliminary evidence. Arnould RJ; Eisenstadt D Q Rev Econ Bus; 1982; 22(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 10254992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]