202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10241258)
1. An approach to patient classification...and some results.
Bihldorff JP; McPhail A; Payne R; Scanlan R
Hosp Adm Can; 1976 Feb; 18(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 10241258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New methodology affords 'grasp' on minimum nursing staff.
Diggs WW; Meyer D; Cadmus J
South Hosp; 1979; 47(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10240296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Study projects mursing staff needs, budget.
Cassell R; Shilling M
Hospitals; 1979 Jul; 53(14):108, 114, 118 passim. PubMed ID: 447255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. NACHRI study quantifies children's hospitals uniqueness.
Perkins LB
Hosp Admin Curr; 1979; 23(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 10241782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a patient classification system for allocating nursing staff.
Ledford C; Mikuleky M
Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(2):44-6, 49-50, 55. PubMed ID: 10275712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nursing staff systems. Gearing care to patient needs.
McNally JK
Cost Containment; 1979 Oct; 1(19):3-5. PubMed ID: 10244119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Juggling staff to reduce costs.
Moriuchi M; Durham J; Noyes B; Zakos M; Hundert M
Dimens Health Serv; 1978 Apr; 55(4):13-4. PubMed ID: 640290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Centralized scheduling allows for "weekends off".
Halseth MJ
Hosp Financ Manage; 1979 Dec; 33(12):44-53, 56-7. PubMed ID: 10244676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nurse staffing: accountability study focuses of staff abilities and patient needs.
Lavery WJ; Maynard WC; Ivan J
Mich Hosp; 1979 Oct; 15(10):26-9. PubMed ID: 10243981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Travel contract nurses: a creative approach to supplemental staffing.
Green K; Wood-McCombs C
Calif Hosp; 1990; 4(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 10105419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Using permanent part-time nursing personnel effectively.
Gaspardy B
Hosp Adm Can; 1975 Aug; 17(8):50-2. PubMed ID: 10241253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A four-year experience with GRASP.
Clayton A; Germain DS
Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Nov; 58(11):8-11. PubMed ID: 7333430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient classification index documents staffing needs.
Burger J; Schmitt P
Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):33-5. PubMed ID: 6924870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Factorial classification key for matching care with need.
White M
Provider; 1988 Feb; 14(2):35-6. PubMed ID: 10285905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple shift patient classification: is it necessary?
Kinley J; Cronenwett LR
J Nurs Adm; 1987 Feb; 17(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 3102705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. P.R.N.: the choice of Toronto General.
Mina ES
Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Nov; 58(11):22-4. PubMed ID: 7333423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nurse staffing, scheduling, and reallocation in the hospital.
Warner DM
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1976; 21(3):77-90. PubMed ID: 10243133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. For staff nurses and patients-the 7-70 plan.
Hutchins C; Cleveland R
Am J Nurs; 1978 Feb; 78(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 246681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurse dependency studies.
Wood DT
Health Serv Manpow Rev; 1979 May; 5(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 10294917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The hospital based staffing agency.
Manion J; Reid SB
Nurs Econ; 1989; 7(6):320-3. PubMed ID: 2586644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]