BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10241917)

  • 1. How microfilming eases handling of medical records.
    Hosp Adm Can; 1976 Aug; 18(8):38. PubMed ID: 10241917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoded microfilming of medical records.
    Thompson HM
    Med Rec News; 1978 Apr; 49(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 10307017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Freeze dried what?
    Totty B
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Jul; 61(7):40-2. PubMed ID: 10105158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hawaii Microfilm helps pioneer use of micrographics in Aloha State.
    Turpin J
    J Inf Image Manage; 1986 Jun; 19(6):22-5. PubMed ID: 10277648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Microphotography of patient records in the Copenhagen Community Hospital in Hvidore].
    Faber H; Christensen JP; Schmidt G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1979 Jul; 141(31):2151-7. PubMed ID: 483420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of microfilming.
    Holmes K; Harley R
    Hosp Adm Can; 1978 Jun; 20(6):41-2, 45, 47. PubMed ID: 10308203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating medical records: a joint venture.
    Williams S; Buffington S
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Mar; 8(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 10286133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UAH Medical Record Department wins award: the inpatient medical record analysis program.
    Kirk R
    Med Rec News; 1976 Feb; 47(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 10243621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calvary hospital turns to micrographics.
    Kaebnick GE
    Inform; 1990 Sep; 4(8):24-5. PubMed ID: 10105933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving medical record completion at a university hospital.
    Stephens JS; Goodnight DL; Porter C; Rahr RR; Whitehead PJ
    Med Rec News; 1980 Jun; 51(3):25-32. PubMed ID: 10247323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical record control and the computer.
    Mishelevich DJ; Kesinger G; Jasper M; Inga P; Robinson AL; Gaige W; Hudson BG; Tyler N
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Dec; 2(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10253964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meeting the challenge.
    Hughes J; Bernard CS
    Comput Healthc; 1987 Apr; 8(4):88-9. PubMed ID: 10280778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The philosophy of a reasonable storage system.
    Kueneman LJ
    Med Rec News; 1978 Jun; 49(3):79-80, 82. PubMed ID: 10307707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case study: concurrent medical record review in a university hospital setting.
    Faust BL; Speck CC
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10303870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Master tracking system: internal medical record control.
    Clark HS
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Dec; 2(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 10253962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The delinquent medical record: new solutions to an old problem.
    Adineh M; Price CR
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 10289702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PCOM's microfilm project saves valuable space.
    OH; 1976 Apr; 20(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 10278052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On-line medical record abstracting.
    Bresnahan M; Cook J
    Med Rec News; 1980 Apr; 51(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 10246922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to know when to switch to microfilm.
    Rymer JE
    OH; 1976 Apr; 20(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 10246430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Micro answer to an enormous problem.
    Hughes J; Hersey A
    Health Soc Serv J; 1978 Jun; 88(4595):667-8. PubMed ID: 10308161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.