128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10242400)
1. Legal models for the treatment of the terminally ill.
Dunn LJ
Trustee; 1979 May; 32(5):7-8, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10242400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient.
Norris JA
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A response to Allen Buchanan's views on decision making for terminally ill incompetents.
Relman AS
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 507060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Moral decisions in medical situations.
Weber LJ
New Cathol World; 1976; 219(1313):214-7. PubMed ID: 11662305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal issues in neonatal intensive care.
Zajac BM
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1989; 34(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 10304002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects].
Pedersen R; Bahus MK; Kvisle EM
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1648-50. PubMed ID: 17571104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Care of the dying: the doctor and euthanasia.
Rizzo R; Yonder J
Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):253-68. PubMed ID: 11662104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II.
Suber DG; Tabor WJ
JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(19):2431-2. PubMed ID: 7131695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bishops' response to Act on Rights of Terminally Ill.
Brodeur D
Health Prog; 1987; 68(1):22-5, 94. PubMed ID: 10280352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emergency physicians and physician-assisted suicide, Part II: emergency care for patients who have attempted physician-assisted suicide.
Moskop JC; Iserson KV
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 11679872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal aspects of end-of-life decisions in Italy: the penal relevance of the limitation of treatment in the terminally ill and the problem of causality by omission. The legal puzzle of end-of-life care in Italy: is therapeutic limitation in the terminally ill patients a crime of omission liable to prosecution?
Fabris EP; Piccinni M
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl; 2008; 42():58-65. PubMed ID: 18289418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Experts react to rulings on treatment withdrawal.
Health Prog; 1987; 68(6):32, 34, 96. PubMed ID: 10283116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Who "pulls the plug:" the practical effect of the Saikewicz decision.
Dunn LJ
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 10240214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children.
Weisleder P
J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e8. PubMed ID: 18757627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship of therapy to prognosis in critically ill patients.
Tagge GF
Linacre Q; 1975 May; 42(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11661177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Providing or withholding treatment: the role of the patient's wish and priorities in palliative care].
Baberg HT; Kielstein R; de Zeeuw J; Sass HM
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Aug; 127(33):1690-4. PubMed ID: 12183801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
