These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10242400)
21. The right to a natural death. Csank JF Hum Life Rev; 1978; 4(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 11661546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Should we focus more on the individual? A discussion of current advance-care planning law in Connecticut. McEvoy K Conn Med; 2002 Nov; 66(11):677-81. PubMed ID: 12476510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Dying in a system of "good care": case report and analysis. Netsky MG Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1976 Apr; 39(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 11661308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Limiting life sustaining therapies]. Azoulay E Rev Mal Respir; 2006 Sep; 23(4 Suppl):13S29-45. PubMed ID: 17057630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill. Hawaii Med J; 1990 Oct; 49(10):375. PubMed ID: 2272806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death. Cantor NL; Thomas GC Buffalo Law Rev; 2000; 48(1):83-173. PubMed ID: 12715817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Court's guidelines on incompetent patients compromise their rights. Connery JR Hosp Prog; 1980 Sep; 61(9):46-9. PubMed ID: 10248004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long term care: issues for physicians. Collier HG; Suldan JI Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):35-40. PubMed ID: 10312434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. End-of-life decision making, therapeutic jurisprudence, and preventive law: hierarchical v. consensus-based decision-making model. Hafemeister TL Ariz Law Rev; 1999; 41(2):329-73. PubMed ID: 12666690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In the laboratory of the states: the progress of Glucksberg's invitation to states to address end-of-life choice. Tucker KL Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1593-612. PubMed ID: 18595217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Medical interventions at the end of life: what is appropriate and who is responsible? Lanier WL Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Nov; 80(11):1411-3. PubMed ID: 16295019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The preservation of life. McCormick RA Linacre Q; 1976 May; 43(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 11662260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. What physicians can do regarding decisions about life support. Raskin D Del Med J; 1989 Mar; 61(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 2703095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The legal status of 'no code orders'. Memel SL; Lemkin JW Hosp Med Staff; 1978 May; 7(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 10306909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Legal issues in end-of-life care in Oklahoma. Cross LL Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2002; 27(3):921-37. PubMed ID: 15478256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Euthanasia: the physician's liability. Thurman V John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 10(1):148-72. PubMed ID: 11661425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The discontinuation of "extraordinary" medical treatment from a terminal patient: a physician's civil liability in New York. Giancola PJ Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 26(3):326-54. PubMed ID: 6155590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]