369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10243334)
1. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices.
Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC
Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. Optimizing rights and limiting liability.
Gilfix M; Raffin TA
West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 6506679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
Shuster E
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 2132018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What are the basic provisions of California's new "Right to Die Bill?".
Gordon PA
Hosp Forum; 1976 Nov; 19(6):17, 22. PubMed ID: 10242087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Life-sustaining treatment: the physician's role in decision-making.
Walker C
Geriatrics; 1992 Jan; 47(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 1729148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Right-to-die laws: creating, not clarifying, problems.
Horan DJ
Hosp Prog; 1978 Jun; 59(6):62-5, 78. PubMed ID: 649133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?
Denbo SM
Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Michigan's sensible "living will".
Relman AS
N Engl J Med; 1979 May; 300(22):1270-2. PubMed ID: 431686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment.
Ferguson G
Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When is medical treatment "futile"?
Bennett AJ
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession.
Murphy JJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Attitudes and practices of patients and physicians towards patient autonomy: a survey conducted prior to the enactment of the Patients' Rights Bill in Israel.
Sadan B; Chejk-Saul T
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2000 Jul; 10(4):119-25. PubMed ID: 16273716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects].
Pedersen R; Bahus MK; Kvisle EM
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1648-50. PubMed ID: 17571104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient.
Brennan TA
Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Living wills: personal and professional perspectives. Death at a New York hospital.
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):260-82. PubMed ID: 3854892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dying right in California. The Natural Death Act.
Jonsen AR
Clin Res; 1978 Feb; 26(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 10304721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
