286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10243622)
21. Integrating medical records: a joint venture.
Williams S; Buffington S
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Mar; 8(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 10286133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Solving a late final diagnosis problem.
Bartholomew J
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Oct; 53(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 10257146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical record control and the computer.
Mishelevich DJ; Kesinger G; Jasper M; Inga P; Robinson AL; Gaige W; Hudson BG; Tyler N
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Dec; 2(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10253964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The flow of charts in one medical record department.
Arnold G; Egger D
Med Rec News; 1978 Apr; 49(2):90-1, 93. PubMed ID: 10307027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reorganizing the medical record for optimal use.
Minuth MG
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Sep; 55(9):29-31. PubMed ID: 10310810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Case study: concurrent medical record review in a university hospital setting.
Faust BL; Speck CC
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10303870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical record work standards: some practical aspects.
Murphy CL
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 10263571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Master tracking system: internal medical record control.
Clark HS
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Dec; 2(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 10253962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Outpatient medical records--are they meeting your needs?
Casey DJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Aug; 57(8):23-5. PubMed ID: 10277554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Workload and staffing in the medical records department at Church Hospital.
Genovese D; Vaughan RG
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 10263572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of performance standards on job satisfaction among medical record department employees.
Stich EK
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):60-4. PubMed ID: 10106094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Word processing for the medical record department and beyond.
Salazar R
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 10310218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cutting the paper chase: streamlining of medical document processing.
Sierra PL; Lach J
J Inf Image Manage; 1986 Sep; 19(9):34-7. PubMed ID: 10279035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of generic outcome screening criteria.
Kennedy BG
Med Rec News; 1980 Apr; 51(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10246929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Incomplete medical records: three case solutions.
Grayson MA
Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Mar; 8(3):21-5. PubMed ID: 10241365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lothian Health Board, Data Protection Act, subject access trial.
Laing IB
Med Rec Health Care Inf J; 1987 Nov; 28(4):78-100. PubMed ID: 10285810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The postdischarge loose laboratory report: medical significance.
Solis DH
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Aug; 53(4):26-32. PubMed ID: 10317240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Monitoring chart completion using SPIRES.
Adineh M
Top Health Rec Manage; 1987 Jun; 7(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10287371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Auditing medical records helps reduce liability.
Ganguli G; Winfrey S
Healthc Financ Manage; 1990 Oct; 44(10):30-5. PubMed ID: 10145322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A method for improving record retrieval time.
Harb CJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Jan; 54(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10309817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
