236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10244399)
1. The pay-for-performance dilemma.
Hills FS
Personnel; 1979; 56(5):23-31. PubMed ID: 10244399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Merit pay: viable?
Farmer CR
Personnel; 1978; 55(5):57-63. PubMed ID: 10239497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compensating the red-circle employee.
Reed PR; Kroll MJ
Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):39-41. PubMed ID: 10274197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design of a compensation system for dental practice.
Scheetz JP; Willis DO
J Am Coll Dent; 1997; 64(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9130806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appraising and paying for performance: another look at an age-old problem.
Kennedy PW; Dresser SG
Empl Benefits J; 2001 Dec; 26(4):8-14. PubMed ID: 11817071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New thinking on how to link executive pay with performance.
Rappaport A
Harv Bus Rev; 1999; 77(2):91-101, 186. PubMed ID: 10387774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Managing employee pay the new way. Part 2: Pay strategies.
Zakian AL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 May; 26(5):46-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10134050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrestling with pay equity? Design your own merit pay delivery system.
Brinks JT
Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):108, 110, 112. PubMed ID: 10250322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recognize performance with merit increases (and keep your nurses happy).
Ruskowski U
Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Aug; 58(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 7286482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Merit pay: fact or fiction?
Lawler EE
Manage Rev; 1981 Apr; 70(4):50-3. PubMed ID: 10251505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. CEO incentives-its not how much you pay, but how.
Jensen MC; Murphy KJ
Harv Bus Rev; 1990; 68(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 10104519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexible merit pay for faculty.
Allcorn S
Med Group Manage; 1986; 33(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 10277664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Putting teeth into pay-for-performance programs.
Jones DW; Hauser MC
Healthc Financ Manage; 1991 Sep; 45(9):32, 34, 36 passim. PubMed ID: 10145492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From status to contribution: some organizational implications of the changing basis for pay.
Kanter RM
Personnel; 1987 Jan; 64(1):12-27, 30-7. PubMed ID: 10280505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Compensation vs. benefits: who gets paid more? A new survey analysis reveals the answer and possible causes.
Reustle A; Schaeffer P
Empl Benefits J; 2001 Dec; 26(4):3-6. PubMed ID: 11817069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Executive pay trends and golden parachute tax: a collision on the horizon.
Johnson DG
Benefits Q; 2004; 20(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 15015423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploding some myths about merit pay.
Umiker WO
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Aug; 16(8):59-60, 62. PubMed ID: 10267474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Achilles heel of merit pay.
Wagner RG
Hosp Top; 1990; 68(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 10104524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Current methods, problems and future trends. The merit of merit pay.
Printz RA; Waldman DA
Pers Adm; 1985 Jan; 30(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 10269516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of pay-for-performance programs on information technology use among child health providers: the devil is in the details.
Menachemi N; Struchen-Shellhorn W; Brooks RG; Simpson L
Pediatrics; 2009 Jan; 123 Suppl 2():S92-6. PubMed ID: 19088236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
