These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10245002)
1. Psychosurgery. Stanridge LW Leg Med Q; 1979; 3(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10245002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research. Benbow S Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychosurgery: the law's response. Annas GJ; Glantz LH Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 11661084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychosurgery in Massachusetts: a task force report. Stone AA Mass Journal Ment Health; 1975; 5(3):26-54. PubMed ID: 11664587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of drug therapy for the mentally ill. Klerman GL Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2352-5. PubMed ID: 892003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting human research subjects: ten common problems. Puglisi T Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):8, 15. PubMed ID: 12542046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories. McGough H IRB; 1998; 20(1):9, 11. PubMed ID: 11655326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Two rules on expedited IRB reviews are final. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary. Reiser SJ; Knudson P IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human experimentation. Arnold LC Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; 21(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 4444464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]