These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10245330)

  • 1. HMO obstacles: program use will depend on motivation.
    Keene KK; McDonald JW
    Bus Insur; 1980 Mar; 14(11):19. PubMed ID: 10245330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Firms push HMO use, dabble in development.
    Matlock MA
    Bus Insur; 1980 Mar; 14(11):3-4. PubMed ID: 10245331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HMO option keeps costs down: survey.
    Bus Insur; 1980 Feb; 14(6):3. PubMed ID: 10245677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Private MDs regroup to fight HMO pinch.
    Lefton D
    Am Med News; 1982 Mar; 25(11):3, 13 contd. PubMed ID: 10254685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the HMO Act good for employers?
    Peres A
    Bus Health; 1988 Feb; 5(4):8-13. PubMed ID: 10285635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Employers seeking individual HMO rates.
    DiBlase D
    Bus Insur; 1985 Dec; 19(51):4, 6-7. PubMed ID: 10274949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A blueprint for forging new HMO relationships.
    Fritz D; Repko DV
    Bus Health; 1986; 3(8):38-9. PubMed ID: 10277279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Employers cautiously optimistic on HMO potential for cost containment.
    Ibbs PJ
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1978 Apr; 32(10):10, 12. PubMed ID: 10306659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of step-rating and price sensitivity on disenrollment and risk selection: the experience of a group practice HMO.
    Wintringham K
    Group Health J; 1982; 3(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 10256505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HMO appeal. Could you get more care for your cash?
    Brazil JH
    Manage World; 1985 Mar; 14(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 10270396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How serious are employers about cutting health costs? Very.
    Gray J
    Med Econ; 1989 Oct; 66(20):112-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 10295969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viability of the HMO concept depends on how well the qualified provider is subsequently monitored.
    Spencer BF
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Oct; 30(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 10278028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HMO community rating by class: employers and HMOs need to collect health status information.
    Cave DG
    Empl Benefits J; 1989 Mar; 14(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10292485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prepaid plans proliferating.
    MD; 1978 Nov; 22(11):55-8. PubMed ID: 10239437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health status takes on new meaning.
    Cave DG; Mayer TR
    Bus Health; 1988 Oct; 5(12):20-2. PubMed ID: 10290516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health care execs promote HMO use to cut down costs.
    Bus Insur; 1979 Dec; 13(25):32. PubMed ID: 10244512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auto makers, UAW launch Detroit HMO.
    Am Med News; 1979 Mar; 22(9):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10240770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Business support helps Baton Rouge HMO grow.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1979 May; 33(11):34-5. PubMed ID: 10277940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knocking down barriers to good health care.
    Harwitz DG
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1980 Mar; 34(9):21, 74. PubMed ID: 10278032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auto industry shifts new Detroit HMO into gear.
    Maes J
    Bus Insur; 1979 Mar; 13(5):23. PubMed ID: 10240390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.