These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10245570)

  • 21. Abortion providers bounce back.
    Carney EN
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Insurance: exclusion of contraception found discriminatory by EEOC.
    Netter W
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 11521259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Some further implications of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
    Greenlaw PS; Foderaro DL
    Pers J; 1980 Jan; 59(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 10245040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accumulated sick leave cannot be used for maternity.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Sep; 32(3):70. PubMed ID: 10304849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion in the United States: barriers to access.
    Fried MG
    Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):174-94. PubMed ID: 10796974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maternity and employment benefits in the United States - where are we now?
    McFarlane DR
    Women Health; 1976; 1(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 10236579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A taxing tale: unconstitutional conditions and abortion subsidy.
    Russell MS
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(2):459-94. PubMed ID: 10133325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lack of insurance coverage for prescription contraception by an otherwise comprehensive plan as a violation of Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act--stretching the statute too far.
    Backmeyer ER
    Indiana Law Rev; 2004; 37(2):437-66. PubMed ID: 16211763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Court stands by abortion.
    Press A; Camper D
    Newsweek; 1983 Jun; 101(26):62-3. PubMed ID: 10260662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High Court overturns Dooling decision ruling Hyde constitutional; HHS discontinues Medicaid financing for abortions.
    Kaunitz K
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Jul; 3(15):3-5. PubMed ID: 10297867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EEOC jeopardizes pregnancy benefits for women who quit.
    Geisel J
    Bus Insur; 1979 Oct; 13(22):1, 101. PubMed ID: 10244096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The abortion issue in the US.
    Fabrizio T
    Nord Med; 1990; 105(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 2320407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Under the radar.
    Tumulty K; Novak V
    Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost of pregnancy benefits soaring.
    Geisel J
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Apr; 9(4):12. PubMed ID: 154031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Department of Defense--Implementation of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services; Amendment No. 4. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1980 Jun; 45(126):43407-8. PubMed ID: 10247433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perspectives. Abortion after Webster.
    Olson EG
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Jul; 43(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. U.S. District Court orders payment of maternity benefits to unwed mothers under Title VII.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Apr; 30(10):26, 28. PubMed ID: 1037496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sex discrimination and insurance for contraception.
    Law SA
    Wash Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 73(2):363-402. PubMed ID: 12465638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.