191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10246169)
1. Certification of need programs: regulation in search of the evaluation process.
Studnicki J
Evaluation; 1975; 2(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 10246169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. HSAs misuse draft CON checklist.
Simler SL
Mod Healthc; 1979 Nov; 9(11):30. PubMed ID: 492113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Certificate of need: an approach to the process.
Knowles EW
Health Care Plann Mark; 1981 Oct; 1(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 10253117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Certificate of need and the pitfalls of due process.
Consedine JF; Jekel JF; Dunaye TM
Inquiry; 1980; 17(4):348-56. PubMed ID: 6450167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital awarded CON for shelled space.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1979 Apr; 60(4):84. PubMed ID: 422174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regs control the planning process as well as the plan.
Berriman WT
Hospitals; 1980 Apr; 54(8):51-4. PubMed ID: 7358375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Status report: health planning and capital expenditure regulation.
Warner DA
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):18-9. PubMed ID: 10277552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A riled community attacks HSA plans.
Honey RB
Patient Care; 1980 Aug; 14(14):184, 186-7, 190 passim. PubMed ID: 10247718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The antitrust status of health planning.
Dolan AK
Health Care Plann Mark; 1982 Jan; 1(4):11-23. PubMed ID: 10254176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Some states center attention on certificate of need.
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Apr; 12(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 10324011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health planning amendments will add to hospitals' certificate-of-need burdens.
Saphier MD
Hosp Forum; 1980; 23(3):47-8. PubMed ID: 10246234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Success in CON process depends on constructive attitudes and actions.
Coffey RJ
Hospitals; 1982 May; 56(10):71-4. PubMed ID: 7040203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fourth Circuit requires limited rule of reason to be applied in hospital antitrust planning case.
Kinney ED
Health Law Vigil; 1982 Nov; 5(23):6-7. PubMed ID: 10257144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. P.L. 96-79 changes CON processes.
Kuntz E
Mod Healthc; 1979 Nov; 9(11):50-1. PubMed ID: 492118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital Building Co. plans appeal in antitrust suit against Rex Hospital.
Richman D
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):142. PubMed ID: 10278302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Public opinion influences decision on CON process.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1982 Jul; 63(7):95, 97. PubMed ID: 10255979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Oklahoma court approves City of Faith certification: cite "national constituency".
Schwartz RL
Health Law Vigil; 1981 Apr; 4(8):10-1. PubMed ID: 10250670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MDPH and comparative CON reviews.
Shannon MA
Mich Hosp; 1984 Jun; 20(6):7-10. PubMed ID: 10266671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital topical law: "A certificate of need".
Morse HN
Hosp Top; 1982; 60(1):2, 18, 28 passim. PubMed ID: 10254145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conditions: a tool for effective certificate-of-need regulation.
Simpson J
Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1980; 5(8):231-40. PubMed ID: 10248039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
