219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10246357)
21. Bishops' response to Act on Rights of Terminally Ill.
Brodeur D
Health Prog; 1987; 68(1):22-5, 94. PubMed ID: 10280352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incompetent's right to die: who decides?
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Defining death, natural death legislation and withdrawal of treatment.
Bates P
Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(4):392-421. PubMed ID: 10124087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Proxy decision-making for the terminally ill: where are the guidelines?
Reed ME; Olson CA
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Jun; 70(6):25-9. PubMed ID: 10271258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Incompetent residents and consent: issues and concerns.
Lutz RM
Provider; 1989 Dec; 15(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 10296601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults.
Barnes G
Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Rights of the embryo/rights of the mother in the embryonal and fetal phase from the legal viewpoint].
Giesen D; Poll J
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Nov; 87(10-11):847-52; discussion 853-62. PubMed ID: 8303927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Ethical decisions at the end of life: principles, uncertainties, perspectives].
Weber M; Kutzer K
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Dec; 127(50):2689-93. PubMed ID: 12481241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [New guidelines support physician-assisted suicide!].
Leijerstam F
Lakartidningen; 2007 Apr 25-May 1; 104(17):1343; author reply 1343. PubMed ID: 17547284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Commentary on discussions about life-sustaining treatments.
Emanuel EJ
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):250-1. PubMed ID: 7841478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality of life and non-treatment decisions for incompetent patients: a critique of the orthodox approach.
Dresser RS; Robertson JA
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 2811462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Importance of understanding suffering for clinical ethics.
Miller FG
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(4):290-1. PubMed ID: 1804400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Brain death/termination of heroic efforts to save life--who decides?
Ufford MR
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1980 Dec; 2(10):5-39. PubMed ID: 10295069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Doctrine of consent poses questions in terminating life support system. Part 2.
Weissburg C; Hartz JN
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979; 12(5):38-41. PubMed ID: 10244575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Health-care decision making, Part II. Choices for incapacitated patients.
Grant K; Huntington SR
Physician Assist; 1989 Jul; 13(7):76-86. PubMed ID: 10293914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Documenting death and dying.
Brown MD
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Jun; 1(4):71-83. PubMed ID: 10251645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Withdrawing life support: a legal assessment and a possible response.
Blum JD
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Apr; 13(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 10266235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hospice: the legal ramifications of a place to die.
Kuzma AL
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1982 Nov; 4(9):5-34. PubMed ID: 10257271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Hospices: medical and legal considerations.
Scham M; Scham A
Leg Med; 1985; ():297-322. PubMed ID: 2423834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The refusal of life-saving medical treatment vs. the state's interest in the preservation of life: a clarification of the interests at stake.
Davis SM
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 Jul; 3(5):5-36. PubMed ID: 10295112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
