These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10246430)

  • 1. How to know when to switch to microfilm.
    Rymer JE
    OH; 1976 Apr; 20(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 10246430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoded microfilming of medical records.
    Thompson HM
    Med Rec News; 1978 Apr; 49(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 10307017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The decision-making process for developing an in-house microimagery center.
    Greenberg SP
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Jun; 4(4):66-73. PubMed ID: 10266784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PCOM's microfilm project saves valuable space.
    OH; 1976 Apr; 20(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 10278052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hawaii Microfilm helps pioneer use of micrographics in Aloha State.
    Turpin J
    J Inf Image Manage; 1986 Jun; 19(6):22-5. PubMed ID: 10277648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microfilm: helping to save space and keep staff.
    Hosp Equip Supplies; 1976 Jan; 22(1):6. PubMed ID: 10243028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microfilm saves hospital from storage crisis.
    AMRO; 1988 Aug; 29(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 10293119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are you in control?
    Murtagh P
    J Microgr; 1981 Feb; 14(2):31-4. PubMed ID: 10249783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-line medical record abstracting.
    Bresnahan M; Cook J
    Med Rec News; 1980 Apr; 51(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 10246922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How microfilming eases handling of medical records.
    Hosp Adm Can; 1976 Aug; 18(8):38. PubMed ID: 10241917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data management: computer time sharing as an alternative.
    Sifferle J
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1982 Jun; 2(4):58-66. PubMed ID: 10255785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the medical records department improves efficiency.
    Micheletti JA; Schlala TJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1987 Dec; 41(12):38, 40, 42 passim. PubMed ID: 10284877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics medical record department computerized systems.
    Little EK
    J Clin Comput; 1981; 9(5):170-4. PubMed ID: 10251455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cost justification: word processing in a medical transcription environment.
    Bifano JL
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Oct; 54(10):13-7. PubMed ID: 10310237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two viewpoints: the preparation of a request for proposal. Viewpoint #2.
    Shanks CK
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jul; 59(7):23-7. PubMed ID: 10302521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal computer applications for the medical record department.
    Garrison LS
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Jun; 8(4):54-63. PubMed ID: 10287513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing a multihospital medical record department.
    Patena KR
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Mar; 8(3):37-47. PubMed ID: 10286132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combatting the discharge data reliability problem.
    Baird R
    Med Rec News; 1979 Jun; 50(3):86-92. PubMed ID: 10242273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model of medical record storage.
    Nimmo AW
    J Oper Res Soc; 1983 May; 34(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 10260228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of generic outcome screening criteria.
    Kennedy BG
    Med Rec News; 1980 Apr; 51(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10246929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.