These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10246474)
1. Drug refusal rights set in California. Psychiatr News; 1980 May; 15(9):30, 35. PubMed ID: 10246474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient autonomy and the refusal of psychotropic medications. Baumgarten E Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 139():13-30. PubMed ID: 6669534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to refuse psychotropic medications. Gallant DM; Irwin M Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 139():31-8. PubMed ID: 6669546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Discussion summary: the right to refuse psychotropic medications. Chapelsky D Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 139():39-41. PubMed ID: 6669547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital blocked from forcing drugs on mental patient. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1979 Jul; 60(7):30, 32. PubMed ID: 447313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New Jersey district court says patients have qualified right to refuse psychotropic drugs. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Jan; 31(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 7353828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychiatric treatment refusal, patient competence, and informed consent. Brown P Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 8(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 3940167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychotropic drugs and informed consent: a report from California. Flynn WR Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Jan; 30(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 758254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychotropic drugs: a constitutional right to informed consent. Zackey JT Trial; 1980 Mar; 16(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 10245634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. United States v. Leatherman: the legality of the administration of psychotropic drugs. Classen HW J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 10280377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Advance directives in a correctional setting. Thomas DL; Watson JM Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "The trouble is they're growing, the trouble is they're grown": therapeutic jurisprudence and adolescents' participation in mental health care decisions. Costello JC Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 2003; 29(3):607-40. PubMed ID: 15868684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. President's message: egalitarianism, medical care, and mental health. Perr IN Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(4):iv-vii. PubMed ID: 551829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [When the patient refuses,... Consent and refusal in medical interventions have legal implications only in certain circumstances]. Zilkens M Fortschr Med; 1986 Sep; 104(36):59. PubMed ID: 3770641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Will you respect me in the morning? The effect of Bill 68 on competent consent. Meadus JE Health Law Can; 2001 Feb; 21(3):57-63. PubMed ID: 11255625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Boston State Hospital case: its impact on the handling of future mental health litigation. Schultz S Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 7284610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental competence, treatment and substitute consent: a psychiatrist's perspective. Kline SA Health Law Can; 1988; 8(4):92-3. PubMed ID: 10312622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mental competence, treatment and substitute consent: a lawyer's perspective. Evans K Health Law Can; 1988; 8(4):96-9. PubMed ID: 10312624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Massachusetts district court affirms the right to refuse psychotropic drugs, seclusion. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Mar; 31(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 7353854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]